Uber it is a failure to report comply to Guidelines Company officials have not reported information like where pickups were made, how much was charged for those pickups, who was picked up, and who was not picked up. Also Driver Safety information. Then i have 30 days to pay the penalty and comply to requirements or. They will be or something that some say would impact them yap it would be a huge issue it would be a huge change, i rely on using it over every week j. R. they stated that they will appeal the decision as super claims to have already produced sufficient data. Uber and compromising individual drivers as well as partners is one of their concerns and they will not have to pay that fine because this is an appeal process. Once that appeal is put into place. People say this is a civil rights dispute. , for example you cannot discriminate who you pick up or where you pick out. Catherine other breaking news tonight. Encouraging signs after former president george h. W. Bush took a
Senator sessions look, its not going to be an in person entity. Proper background check. You need to be defending the peoples public safety. If you need more money to do this, you need to ask for it. If you want to rubber stamp the process, keep doing the way youre doing it. Ms. Saldana, section 1373 of title 8 of the u. S. Code provides among other things quote, a federal state, or local Government Entity or official may not prohibit or in any way restrict any Government Entity or official from sending to or receiving from i. C. E. Information regarding a citizenship or immigration status lawful or unlawful of any individual. Close quote. Dont you think that resolutions by City Councils or state governments or sheriffs in certain jurisdictions, directing their officers not to honor detainers or otherwise notify i. C. E. That they have arrested someone thats unlawfully in the country could violate or would violate section 1373 . Secretary saldana well, all of that is part of litigation
The gavel comes down next right here on cspan. And to get us to the top of the the u. S. House, a portion now of a washington journal segment from this weekend with Newt Gingrich. We welcome back former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, out with a new book. We will talk about that in just a moment. And your wife and her new posting. Lets talk about president george w. Bush. Politicsh, he says seems to be more vulnerable conspiracy theories or outright fabrication. He took aim at the present without mentioning him specifically. Your reaction. Guest i think there are very real differences between president bush and senator mccain, who also had a tough speech this week, and President Trump. Part of the republican primary fight in 2015 and 2016 is which of those two worldviews did Republican Voters want. By a decisive margin, they thought the past was not to their advantage, and they want to change. I can appreciate trump was not recruited by the establishment. He won a hostile takeover. I can
[captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. Visit ncicap. Org] fairly short recess and recess until 4 30 eastern time debate several bills. On the agenda today, dealing with veterans, home if modifications with debate sever bills. On veterans who are disabled. And gray stones for family members. Eaker mpore he houl me t order r la, faer confby haplny p day. Uverse, weiv youanor givin bls members the assembly ashey t upon ysrkse hrs, hese as legislation on taxes continues to be debated this week and neblings may all members be mindful that the institutions and structures of our great nation guarantee the opportunities that have allowed some to achieve Great Success while others continue to struggle. May their efforts these days guarantee that there are not winners and losers under new tax laws, but benefits balanced and shared by all. By all americans. May your blessing, o god, be with them and with us all this d
Good afternoon. I would like to start off today by having the secretary of takence discussion action last night with respect to canadian softwood lumber. It was an action that talks about what we are doing to make sure we are fighting for industries here at home. Without further a do, i want to bring up secretary wilbur ross. The action we took last night is actually the culmination of a couple of decades of disputes between the United States and canada. What has provoked the dispute is the following. In canada, the forests are owned by the individual per provinces and each of the provinces set the charge for the loggers to use when they are taking trees down. In the u. S. , it is all open market, it is all marketbased prices. Subsidize thees cutting down of lumber. Sts technical term being umpage and that allows them to charge a subsidized low price at the u. S. Border. We have determined preliminarily those problems vary from one province to the other, in some cases are as high as ro