Shock the world and said he is not ready to support donald j trump, billionaire. We read to his statement in response to ryan but donald trump called into the Fox News Network to flesh out his side of this spat in more details. I was surprised by it. It is fine. He can do whatever he wants. Many other people were surprised. Some were really surprised and not happy about it. Comingmany endorsements in left and right. He is one of the only ones that was surprising. John was there more . There was more. He uses favorite social media microphone to derive the house speaker. He tweeted out then, an hour later, he escalated his thinking even more when Katrina Pearson went on cnn and had tough words for ryan. If the republican speaker of the house does not come around to support the republican nominee do you think paul ryan is fit to be speaker . No. This is about the party. Cyclest two president ial we were told john mccain was a conservative. His conservative review scorecard is 37 . A were
Recovery, after paul ryan ocksked of the argyle s off the Republican Party. And said he is not ready to support donald j. Trump, billionaire. We read into his statement, in response to ryan, but donald trump called into the Fox News Network to flesh out his side of this spat in more details. Mr. Trump i was surprised by it. It is fine. He can do whatever he wants. It is fine. I was surprised by. Many other people were surprised. Some were really surprised, and not happy about it. I have many endorsements coming in, left and right. He is one of the only ones that was surprising. John was there more . Oh, there was more. He used his favorite social media microphone to deride the house speaker. He tweeted out. I did not inherited, i won it with millions of votes then, an hour later, he escalated his thinking even more, when Katrina Pearson went on cnn and had tough words for ryan. If he does not change his mind. If the republican speaker of the house does not come around to support the re
Leadership that you have shown and the people in this room have shown, including the chief beck. Mandatory minimums are an important part of how the federal system is set up, but since 2013 when he smart on crime policy was announced by thenattorneygeneral holder, federal prosecutors have been instructed not to use mandatory minimums except in cases that really merit their attention. In other words, aggravated felons, the leaders of drug organizations, violent people. What thats meant is that our use of mandatory minimums has probably dropped by about 25 in that time. But so far we have not seen a corresponding drop in the willingness of lowerlevel conspirators to cooperate with us. In other words, what we are seeing in the smart on crime policy is a direct ability to reduce mandatory sentences while still protecting the public. So the bottom line is, you asked the question should we eliminate mandatory minimums entirely. And i think the answer to that is no. But we have to reserve the
There are a number of convicted terrorists that are currently serving time on u. S. Soil. Let me give you some examples. There are people like zacarias moussaoui, a mastermind, one of the master mindse of the 9 11 attacks. He was tried and convicted in the u. S. Court and hes somebody thats currently incarcerated right now as we speak on american soil, in an american rison. This is also true of people like tsarnaev and the shoe bomber. Another pertinent example that warrants mentioning here, the name of ahmed galani, quicked of his involvement in the plot to carry out bombings at the u. S. Embassies in kenya and tanzania. Many of you may recall that galani was for a period of time in the prison at Guantanamo Bay, transferred to the United States, tried in american court, convicted of his crimes, and sentenced to live in prison in an american prison on american soil where he serves right now. So the suggestion that this cannot be done safely flies in the face of every piece of Available
The speaker pro tempore on this vote, the yeas are 399, the nays are two. 2 3 of the votes in the affirmative, the rules are awe spended, the resolution is agreed to, without objection the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. Ursuant im pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the Unfinished Business is on agreeing to the speakers approval of the journal which the chair will put de novo. The question is on agreeing to the speakers approval of the journal. Those in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it. The journal stands approved. For what purpose does the gentleman from california rise . Mr. Speaker, i send to the desk a joint resolution and ask unanimous consent for its immediate consideration. The speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the title of the joint resolution. The clerk house joint resolution 76, joint resolution appointing the day for the convening of the second sthofingse 114th congress. The speaker pro tempore is there objectio