Because of pregnancy. Justice kennedy unless i missed something. Mr. Bagenstos on the Summary Judgment record, the three very broad classes of limitations that u. P. S. Acome dates do at least, they cover the waterfront of everything but pregnancy but our position those three classes even if there are some conditions out there. Justice thats a necessary starting point. You started out by really giving a misimpression. Mr. Bagenstos i would submit thats not right. On this Summary Judgment record u. P. S. Acknowledges they provide accommodations but also the Summary Judgment record shows that u. P. S. Provides accommodations to drivers with injuries with. Disqualification and u. P. S. Hasnt pointed to a similar driver who didnt get accommodated who was not pregnant. Just just lets accept for arguments sake, people who are injured offduty. Justice ginsburg lets suppose one category does. Mr. Bagenstos our position would be that the employer would be required to treat the pregnant plaintif
And we got to take those into consideration when they consider eith we had a republican, a democrat, and an independent but this kind of hits home with my family. My father was in the Second World War and my mother has letters about the soldiers be ordered by the generals to execute the japanese prisoners right after they interrogate them. Of course it went on in the korean war. It is always the soldiers that take the brunt of this. If you remember, president obama said we had to take it easy in afghanistan with civilian casualties. And the following weekend, the general mcchrystal, who i feel should be in jail, bond that bombed that wedding and they killed 59 civilians there. Of course, couple weeks later he was relieved of duty. If you look at the generals order with young girls in the south to abuse those prisoners that came down from the bush administration. Why is it always the youngest kids that take the brunt of this . There is a reason we have 23 suicides of these soldiers when
The former secretary of states choice to communicate by email. To focus and talk about the Hillary Clinton emails that stirred up the media and is continuing to be a focus point. If you go to press. Org, you can get all the details about our National Press club. If youre not a member, consider becoming a member because we have more than 3000 members all over the world. With that, let me introduce our panel. Mr. Jason baron. He is a friend of our press club. We have missed patrice. Ms. Patrice, miss liz and mr. Tom. He has written the book and has brought it with him. Let me start with mr. Baron with his opening remarks. Jason privileged to be here. On march 3, the New York Times published a story about ms. Clinton and i was quoted as saying it is difficult to perceive a scenario short of Nuclear Winter where agency would be justified to allow this officer to solely use private email Communications Channels for the conduct of government business. When i was first informed by mr. Schmid
Electronically and use tools to separate it out by the kind of line that the capstone proposes. I think there are opportunities for partnerships. The reason we know that a separatist leader bragged about shooting down of lane in ukraine that turned up to be the malaysian jetliner is because the internet archives in San Francisco saved that social media tweet and it was taken down off the facebook or the equivalent of Facebook Page him almost immediately but it has been saved and you can find it. I think that kind of approach to federal Records Management is the way out. It is not a cost matter. Host thank you. Liz wants to say something. Liz from an Information Management and governance perspective, a record is a record regardless of if it is a tweet, paper. Were glad the federal records act now shows you can capture anything electronically. We are not talking about just email but Electronic Communications of any sort. This highlights the fact that, when you go to congress and you are
Beyond nuclear. You have our panelists. Israeli, and so and so. The reason netanyahu and the hawks in washington are pushing that Administration Strategy is to contain iranian influence and power. This is the reality. As long as they really do not recognize the fact. What is the fact . I believe for 35 years, the u. S. , the world powers, they did everything they could on coercion strategies against iran. Multilateral sanctions. U. N. Sanctions. The war against iran. Even using chemical weapons. They all supported the weapons of mass destruction against iranians. They all supported the use of weapons of mass destructions against iranians. 100,000 uranium and 100,000 iranians were killed or injured. No other country, and the past 35 years, has been under so much pressure and sanctions orchestrated by the u. S. However, after 35 years, everybody today is crying and complaining, why is iran so stable . White ironic so powerful why iran is so powerful . Iran is everywhere. This is evidence