Now sitting. God save the United States and this honorable court. We will hear arguments in case 19 431 Little Sisters of the poor v. Pennsylvania in the consolidated case. General francisco. Mr. Chief justice, may it please the court. In 2011, the government required employers to provide Insurance Coverage for all fda approved contraception, including many religious employers who objected to the coverage, sparking years of litigation. Traditions the best of this countrys commitment to religious liberty, the government sought to resolve the issue by promulgating new rules, excepting those employers who objected to the mandate. Those exemptions are lawful for two reasons. First, they are authorized by whichn 13a4 of the aca, requires employers to provide the types of coverage that the health, resources, and services of administration provide for and support. So it authorizes the agencies to require most employers to provide contraceptive coverage while exempting the small number of empl
In 2011, the government required employers to provide Insurance Coverage for all fda approved contraception, including many religious employers who objected to the coverage, sparking years of litigation. Traditions the best of this countrys commitment to religious liberty, the government sought to resolve the issue by promulgating new rules, excepting those employers who objected to the mandate. Those exemptions are lawful for two reasons. First, they are authorized by whichn 13a4 of the aca, requires employers to provide the types of coverage that the health, resources, and services of administration provide for and support. So it authorizes the agencies to require most employers to provide contraceptive coverage while exempting the small number of employers who have sincere Conscientious Objections. But it does not create an all or nothing choice. Require coverage for everyone or no one. Otherwise, the Longstanding Church exemption, the effective exemption for selfinsured church plan
From the Health Care Laws Birth Control mandate. This is one hour 40 minutes. The chief justice and the associate justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. Oyez, all persons having businesses are admonished to give their attention for the court is now sitting. God save the United States under this honorable court. We will hear arguments in case number 19431. Little sisters of the poor versus pennsylvania and the consolidated case. General francisco . Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court. In 2011, the government advised employers to provide coverage for contraception. Including religious employers who objected. Sparking years of litigation. Traditions the best of this countrys commitment to religious liberty, the government thought to resolve the issue by propagating new rules, exempting those employees who subjected to the mandate. Those exemptions are lawful for two reasons. Are authorized by section 1384 of the aca, which requires employers to provide the types of
The speaker pro tempore on this vote, the yeas are 224 and the nays are 194. The current resolution is adopted. Without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the Unfinished Business is the vote on the motion of the the gentlewoman from new york, ms. Velazquez, to suspend the rules and pass h. R. 5078 as amended. On which the the yeas and nays are ordered. The clerk will report the title. The clerk h. R. 5078, a bill toll amend the Small Business act to provide reentry counseling and Training Services for incarcerated persons and now other purposes. The speaker pro tempore will the house suspend the rules and pass the bill as amended. Members will record their votes by electronic device. This is a fiveminute vote. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc. , in cooperation with the United States house of representatives. Any use of the closedcaptioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commerc
It hearts Internet Access. They can set their own rules in different states. Next a discussion on what that means for Internet Users, and possible next steps by congress. The Congressional Internet Caucus Academy hosted this if it. Last about an hour. [background sounds] going to go ahead and get started. Welcome to the sludge panel titled circuit court, what now. It is hosted by the Congressional Internet Caucus Academy in conjunction with another. One of the cochairs of the caucus, so long with representative collins, and others. The internet caucus was created 20 years ago. To help inform the debate in the discussion about key internet policy questions and of course Net Neutrality is at the top of that list. Even though, all of us and all of our buses may not agree, this case is important for all of us. Im glad we get a chance to hear from various stakeholders and their views on how we should be thinking about this. This is been a top issue for my boss for monday years. This case in