good evening to all of you. thank you for coming on. president trump personally interviewed two candidates in manhattan and brooklyn one of the positions for southern district of new york which oversees the trump tower this means the u.s. attorney would have authority in cases related to the president s dealing and we know the two candidates who interview with the president have connection with the law firms with close trump confidents what s your reaction? it s very concerning and surprising to me. there have been reports that the u.s. attorney office in new york is investigating trump businesses and here you have the president doing something that is very unusual. president obama never
situation if it comes up. but she should are never been appointed in the first place. it s error to say it s speculation, we have a long track record of this president not caring one bit about what is regular, what s decent, or what is lawful. it s about his self-preservation. like he has an albatross around his neck that he killed and he can t get rid of it and it drives him to distraction that he could be prosecuted or his close confidents would disclose what they did in the election. stand by everybody, i have to take a break. you nervous?
two sons. don junior and jared kushner, who of the closest confidents of candidate trump. a meeting set up under the presence of getting dirt on hillary clinton. now one of them is running the family business, the other is still by the president s side. this time, in the white house. a rule that is causing stretch and discomfort for some, at least according to the new york times, trump s personal tors. they have been deeply frustrated by the president, they say that kushner is whip p whispering in his ear. more specifically did he know
didn t he? he did, indeed. he was counselled by his secretary of treasure, mr. kahnly akahn conley and mr. buchanan who s got a new book out. what about the memoranda that comey apparently wrote and we assume are in the files at the justice department and that he shared with some close confidents. what about those memoranda? they could be evidence in some sort of legal battle as well. absolutely. as jeff tube ip was saying, this is going to play out on a political level and a potential criminal trial level while a sitting isn t not going to be hauled into a criminal court, an impeachment proceeding will look to see if he s violated a civil statue. and that raises a real question. has he now do we have evidence of obstruction of justice? and that raises the question of
for your free home care planning guide. . vladimir putin laughed after questions about the firing of james comey today, speaking to cbs while dressed in full hockey gear. your question looks very funny to me. can t be angry with me. we have nothing to do with that. president is acting in accordance with his confidents and in accordance with the law and constitution. what about us, why me. you see i m going to play hockey