Call to order advance. Call to order post the colors. Color scattered please join me in the pledge of alligence. Color guard retreat. Color guard dismissed. You may be seated. Thank you very much. Can we give our girl scouts a warm round of applause. applause so these young women are senior girl scouts which means they are in high school, and they represent a few different troops that are working on learning how to interact with the world. To travel, they do a lot of Different Things but to explore the world and to support younger girls, bringing them along. A couple of them i know are working on their girl skoud Leadership Award thats like its the equivalent of the eagle award. So let me just introduce myself. Ill let you know how well move through this town hall but first i want to say thank you. Thank you for coming out. For participating in the process. For being part of this conversation. Whether you came because you have a concern and you disagree or whether you came because you
Club versus trump. Proceed. Nice to see you again. Thank you, chief judge thomas. May it please the court on behalf of the defendants. With me is karen hekker from the department of defense, general counsel. This case is about an internal transfer of funds among dods accounts and the internal transfer itself didnt harm plaintiffs, in fact, they dont contend otherwise, they contend that their interests were harmed by the subsequent downstream use of funds from the construction at border barriers and roads. But the transfer itself was authorized by a provision in the dod precipitations act, and that provision was not designed to protect the kinds of interest that the plaintiffs here assert, the kinds of recreational aesthetic and Environmental Concerns that theyve raised. The zone of interest requirement, which is a universal requirement, whether theyve whether theyre seeking refew under the apa or under an equitable it applies in any event and asks the court to determine whether those k
The time is set for argument in the case of sierra club versus trump. Take your seat. Nice to see you again. Thank you chief justice smith. Thomas byron from the department of justice on behalf of the government defended. With me is karen hecker office of general counsel. This case is about an internal transfer assignment among the ods accounts and the internal defense for itself didnt harm plaintiffs, they dont contend otherwise. They contend their interests were harmed by the subsequent downstream use of these funds for construction of border barriers and roads. But the transfer itself was authorized by a provision in the dod operations act and that provision was not designed to protect the kind of interests the plaintiffs assert, the kinds of recreational aesthetic and Environmental Concerns theyve raised. The requirements which is a universal requirement, whether theyre seeking review under the apa or under an equitable ultra viris claim, applies in any event and it asks this court
At the end of december. Since then i think we have all been taking stock of everything our dear friend has accomplished. And everything he means to so many people. I have long said if they were to hold a secret populated contest Johnny Isakson would win in a bipartisan landslide quite possibly in a unanimous vote. He commands bipartisan respect and affection to a degree that is truly remarkable. If you think about it and make sense for a mans whose mantra goes like this two kinds of people, friend and future f friend. For most people that might be a noble aspiration. The unrealistic. Both are Johnny Isakson its a statement of fact. Nobody is an enemy, nobody is a stranger, just friends and future friends, that is it. With a model like that, it is no wonder that johnnys first was a successful step in the field in which relationships are everything. It strikes me there two ways you can thrive in a business where friendships and Connections Matter so much. You could be either good at faki
Parties requested in denied expedited hearing for this case before the us court of appeals for the ninth circuit. Following the Supreme Court order allowing the administration to temporarily begin construction using the funds. The time is set for argumentin the case of sierra clubversus trunk. Take your seat. Nice to see you again. Thank you chief justice smith. Thomas byron from the department of justice on behalf of the government defended. With me is karen hecker office of general counsel riyadh this case is about an internal transfer assignment among the ods accounts and the internal defense for itself didnt harm plaintiffs, they dont contend otherwise. They contend their interests were harmed by the subsequent downstream use of these funds for construction of border barriers and roads. But the transfer itself was authorized by a provision in the dod operations act and that provision was not designed to protect the kind of interests the plaintiffs assert, the kinds of recreational