reading every hour from the same rachel maddow says what she wants to say. everybody else seems to be reading from some script that jeffff zucker wrote. however located are these channels are? i think the collusion between the media apparatus, the dominant media apparatus other than fox, andnd the dnc, the deep state, it s profound. the international elites who want to this all to be true. we have to remember, there is an international angle here, which we are looking at the ukraine angle but there is an international angle here because donald trump came along and he was the greatest rapper on the scene. i don t buy into what you are doing at the e.u., god bless you, i don t buy into your wine cellar is in your confab said you are think tanks. this whole industry employs thousands of thousands of people and donald trump says, this is not working n well for the united states. he was an existential threat to them. they cheered this whole thing on, they shall out the money for all the
forces. they had a titanic struggle for the nomination in 2016 and there are people in the clip camp who fault sanders for not being more forceful about people thinking of voting for third party candidates to vote for hillary in 2016. by statement token, i think there s still some ouchiness on the part of sanders forces about how the whole primary season wednesday town. the last thing i would expect a big confab between the of two them. let me throw a little hypothetical out there. let s stay dow stays in record territory. let s say unemployment is at 4% or even more. let s say the mueller report doesn t find collusion between trump and russia. are democrats going to pay the price at the ballot box? well, look, the economy was very strong in the mid-term elections and democrats did pretty well. one should not underestimate the
in 2016. and by the same token, i think there is still some ouchiness on the part of the sanders forces about how the whole primary season went down. so the last thing i would expect is a big confab between the two of them. you interviewed presidential candidates under elizabeth warren for a new episode of the axe files tonight. here s a sneak peek. you said the other day that donald trump might not be a free man by 2020. which seemed like a kind of brazen shot. well, is that any surprise? look at the number of investigations that are swirling around him. i never had anything like this before in history. but what is your, i mean he is going to be the first president who live tweets the opposing party s primaries, so he is going to be inserting himself regularly. you felt a little of the brunt of that but i don t think he
global leaders, some of them to take the stage that day two of davos, including german chancellor angela merkel and shinzo abe. the move less optimistic than last year as policy leaders worry about the slowdown, trade tensions and climate change. cnn s julia chatterley is live in davos. julia, a lot being made of who is not there at this confab of the world s richest and most important. reporter: yeah, christine, you hit the nail on the head, i think. the elephant in the room is simply who isn t here. the rifts that you mentioned, the u.s./china trade war, the brexit and donald trump and theresa may simply aren t here. we re talking about solutions to problems where the leaders aren t present to give us an idea here. i think the big debate right now, everybody talks about the
no, definitely not. i mean, and i don t see that happening anytime soon. because we had heard that there were a group of republicans. yes. who are quite uncomfortable with the government shutdown and that they have had a confab behind closed doors and they re trying to anything out something palatable to democrats. they. lindsey graham and several other republicans met yesterday with jared kushner and they re trying to figure out a way out. some democrats, i think, are involves tangentially. but here s the problem. if they come up with, my understanding is let s say it s $3 billion for the wall and several other what they call sweeteners for democrats, you still have to convince the president and frankly the democratic leadership which is now not interested in giving an inch on the wall because they see how politically imperative the president sees it for himself which makes it even more imperative politically for them