Here to indoctrinate but to listen. Plus ninety connect to an unbiased agenda subscribe now on youtube. And action packed life. Anythings possible as long as up because he and his friends can dream at its roots here in kenya stuck dob refugee camp. His life story may have grown into a. Twenty seven years ago but there is no holding back his dreams. Thank you for what cinema the dogma of sorts may twenty seventh through on t w. Forty years after the Islamic Revolution iran is a country torn between the conservative influence of the clerics and a desire for change. You can go online and find out whats going on in the world in a matter of minutes you can expect the Younger Generation to stand still young people will move on if equipment. Many are pushing back against the country strict social and cultural laws. Or theres a new law that says we can only sing in the persian but since we started out weve always aim to be international international. And many are testing their own limits in t
Balloon Juice - Thursday Morning Open Thread: Truth, Justice, and the American Way
balloon-juice.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from balloon-juice.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
beach. in the after of course the point is important goodwin, they really are all kinds of conduct that might be reprehensible, bad, morally wrong, even insidious, that is not criminal. it is particularly true with regards to speech, because speech is protected by the first amendment, importantly sal. but this is not one of those cases. in fact, as she pointed, out none other than jack smith himself makes that point on page two of the indictment. quote, the defendant had a right like every american, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome determinative fraud during the election and that he won. and one of the things, really indictment today, that it does so well is, smith and the lawyers that wrote this, really seek to clearly delineate when things move from protected speech, political advocacy, hardball politics, to a criminal conspiracy as laid out in the fact contained in the indictment.
review of this decision by judge makes. you can t appeal every decision. there are only certain appeals, either side, and so the judge determines when the case goes to trial. clearly if the judges off of her rocker, which this one isn t, things happen. she has a reputation for moving cases along. clearly, this is the biggest case ever in the united states history. i don t think that she is going to be moved because of that. obviously they are in titled to make motions. they have to have enough time to try the case. i don t think that this judge will allow for unnecessary limitless delay. and what she said very quickly, if it goes to the court of appeals, and i don t think that they have much spaces for doing it. this is a court of appeals in contrast to the other circuit that knows the high jinx very quickly. all right, catherine, christian, thank you very much. we learn something there.