so they re watching him. well, the problem was they did not have any other corroborating information to identify him as a threat. what has to be determined is, was information on shahzad put into the terrorism databases and was there any other corroborating information that they missed? we can put things together. they went to the trouble of checking him out on making a condo sale but didn t notice he went over there for five months to get training in terrorism? they went to pakistan, but they didn t know connect the dots. checking him out before and then they saw he went for terrorist training. so the question is one dot would be enough i think. sometimes that s true. the question is, did the fbi know that there was a linkage to known organizations over there? was she just visiting his family? look, nobody likes most people a guy show later on, a politician who likes profiling. nobody likes profiling per say. the guy, he s got a beard, dark complexion, accent.
they missed? we can put things together. they went to the trouble of checking him out on making a condo sale but didn t notice he went over there for five months to get training in terrorism? they went to pakistan, but they didn t know connect the dots. checking him out before and then they saw he went for terrorist training. so the question is one dot would be enough i think. sometimes that s true. the question is, did the fbi know that there was a linkage to known organizations over there? was she just visiting his family? look, nobody likes most people a guy show later on, a politician who likes profiling. nobody likes profiling per say. the guy, he s got a beard, dark complexion, accent. that s rotten anti-american behavior, but checking out a guy who s been naturalized but heading back over there for a period of months, who is obviously a little suspicious in the beginning, you would think they would do a better job on a guy like this. i think as long as th