constantly they re sitting behind him. that wasn t the same process that happened in britain over the course of boris johnson s tenure. so a lot of reasons that what happened there is different than here. but i think it should be seen as a warning for britain that they were relying a lot on sort of norms of behavior, the johnson didn t care as much about, and unless they affirm the data fixes norms a little bit more concretely, they could be more trouble next. i m okay, he s a caretaker prime minister until october. we are going to leave. thank you so much philip bomb, and that s gonna do it for me on this edition for alex witt reports, i ll see you tomorrow at noon eastern. meantime, my friend yasmin use of being continues or. of being continues or. coverage friend of being continues or. cibinqo - now fda approved 100% steroid free not an injection, cibinqo is a once-daily pill for adults of being continues or. nfections,
is something that the president likes to do in nearly every foreign i think he s met with servicemen in every foreign trip that he s taken so far. so that is something that he will also do over the course of his visit in the next two days. kevin, let me ask you, hanging over all of this visit, we re expecting some sort of weapons test by the north koreans, which i believe is a first while a u.s. president is visiting. so first off, concretely, are they taking any extra sort of security precautions or special protocols? and more broadly, how are the u.s. and south korea going to respond to this, what are the on pos position options? reporter: in terms of the securities protocol, i don t think that the white house would lay them out ahead of time. but certainly whenever the president travels anywhere in the world, there is a massive security contingent that accompanies him. so i m not sure that they are necessarily worried about that so much for the security co
that we are not headed to a recession? i can tell the american people we are much better positioned when it comes to that recession question than any other advanced economy than i have seen. so you can t rule it out is what i m hearing? hold on. you can t rule anything out. let me make the point. key here is less about forecasting possibilities. what are we actually doing concretely. picked off a lot of positive indicators of the economy approaching the position of strength the president talks about it every time we speak. we are under marching orders every time from this president.
and this is absolutely terrifying because when the whole world is watching people dying in the city. and can do nothing. absolutely nothing. this is just heartbreaking and it is so desperate for us. and secretary general was here in kyiv. concretely to confirm and to make sure that these human humanitarian would get out. you see as of now we re not able to get them out again. this proves you yet again that there cannot be an agreement with russia that they honor. even a fairly minor point to stop firing at a particular road to get our people. women, children and unarmed men. die of hunger and thirst. to get them out of the city. this is heartbreaking that all the leader of the world feel
sci-ops unclear? sergei lavrov said yesterday, raising the spec tore of that. is there the possibility there could be a russian strike on a nato target even? i would say we don t have reason to believe that concretely at this stage, but this is all coming on the heels of the defense secretary lloyd austin s words, which were very strong, saying that ukraine can win this war if they have the right support and we want to give em the right support and, by the way, the new u.s. policy appears to be now to sort of slowly try to bleed russia dry. throughout this war. none of these 125i789s come in a vacuum. they are often in direct response to something else that happened. yesterday you had european countries, dozens of them meeting, the defense ministers meeting and you have lavrov talk about nuclear threats. i think there s no question