how lousy your life is getting. jason , your thoughts on that? again, another actct of desperation. i mean, i guess they re goingve to try some version of this in harvard, but why don t you try just basic law and order? why don t we just make crime an issue and just actually make things safer? and i m not talkingsafe about jt what s going on with dave chappelle. i m talking about everybody who is t living in an inner city and a big city. i think that is much more important and pertinent then some touting of hey, just becausef j you re a person of color that hey, maybe we re going to start handing you money because of something that happened a couple of hundred years ago. i don t hle h think that s goino be a winning formularm and reparations and ro reparations row and the insurrection righton. that s what they re runningre on , i guess. kayleigh and jason, so great to have you both on now former secretary of state mike pompeo, he raisedry some serious concers this morning about the sen
panicking now. harris: quickly. the southern district of new york cases that were put forth. we have seen them go far and wide. what happens next for the president with regard to any of that? this would, every indication we have on this, this would not affect the cases. the cases will continue on i believe, talked about before that those are, you know, proceeding on and are getting the further down the line. remember the inspector general at the department of justice is still investigating the fisa abuses. there are things we need to go back to remind people what really did happen. if the report comes back as we think it will and there is no collusion. hopefully that is what it will say and we think it will. but we can go back to show where there were oncers at the department of justice and the other things that precipitated the russia investigation. strozk, page, mccabe and others who circumvented the procedures and sur circumvented things that led
i ll also bring you an amazing story. free and fair elections in china. i ll explain. but first, here s my take. president obama has been trying to cool down the war fever that suddenly gripped washington early this month. but prime minister benjamin netanyahu s visit and the flurry of statements surrounding it have created a dangerous dynamic. it is easy to see how things move toward war. it is difficult to see how they don t. the pressure is building on iran, but there are no serious discussions of negotiated solutions. israel has already discounted the proposed new talks. republican candidates will denounce any deal no matter how comprehensive the inspections. so either iran suddenly and completely surrenders or israel will strike. and netanyahu knows that the window presented by the u.s. political season is closing. if he were to strike between now and november, he would be assured of unqualified support from washington. after november, the american response becomes les
and let s listen. america s commitment to security in israel is unshakable. our friendship with israel is deep and enduring. and so we believe that any lasting peace must acknowledge the very real security concers s that israel faces every single day. israel, a small country of less than 8 million people look out at a world where leaders of much larger nations threaten to wipe it off of the map. well, president obama really wants to be a part of the solution in the middle east just as many other presidents who have gone before him, so how bad would a u.s. veto of palestinian veto make our nation and the president look in that region? a veto by the united states particularly at this moment where we have seen arabs from north africa to yemen in the east rising up demanding