/PRNewswire/ Helios Education Foundation recently announced the expansion of its Board of Directors with the appointment of Jim Swanson, a top business.
Satish Kumar Gupta and Others
(Essar Steel case) held
that allowing claims apart from those covered in a resolution plan
to survive after the approval of a resolution plan militates
against the rationale of Section 31 of the IBC. The Supreme Court
held that the successful resolution applicant should be given an
opportunity to take over and run the business of the corporate
debtor on a clean slate. Accordingly, a resolution applicant should
not be suddenly faced with undecided claims which would
throw into uncertainty the amounts payable by a resolution
applicant to take over the business of the corporate debtor.