was substantial periods of supervision once the person if your view it s more of a deterrent to have somebody substantially supervised in terms of their computer use who is looking at child pornography than it is to put them in jail? i m not saying it s more or less. that s exactly what you are saying. what i would like to point out is that if we are going to let me say it this way. congress has authorized courts to use a number of different means to achieve the purposes of punishment. one of them is enhanced punishment by using a computer. the enhancement with respect to using a computer relates to the penalty in terms of incarceration. and you would choose not to apply that in these cases. you have said that.
kinds of restraints that sex offenders are ordered, rightly, to live under at the end of the day. the sentences in these cases include not only prison time but restraints on computer use, sometimes for decades, restraints on ability to go near children, sometimes for decades. all of these things, judges consider in order to effect what congress has required, which is a sentence that is sufficient but not greater than necessary. let me just ask you. to promote the purposes of punishment. you said this a couple of times now. the sentences that congress require. congress wanted the guidelines to be mandatory. congress wrote the guidelines in this case. they wanted them to be mandatory. they gave the courts factors to consider to choose between the sentencing range. congress wanted you to choose
it is about all the other kinds of restraint that sex offenders are ordered rightly to live under at the end of the day. sentences in these cases include not only prison time but restraints on computer use. sometimes for decades. restraints on ability to go near children. sometime for decades. all of these things judges consider in order to effect what congress has required, which is a sentence that is sufficient but not greater than necessary. to promote the purposes of punishment. let me ask but that last point. you ve said this a couple times now. the sentence that s congress requires. congress wanted it to be mandatory. congress wrote the guidelines in this case. they wanted they will to be mandatory. they gave the courts factors to consider to choose between the
i think the best way to deter crime when it comes to child as you lower the boom on anybody who goes on the internet and pulls out these images for their pleasure. senator come every person and all of these charts and documents i sent to jail because i know how serious this crime is. every person i discussed the harm of these terrible, terrible images. i talk about what these crimes due to the people who are being abused in these photos and on the other side. i ensure that they are facing lengthy periods of supervision and restriction on their computer use so they could not
respectable great i wonder what joe had to say about the laptop now part. i remember when computer use to take up a whole room, and no they ve got them so small, and you can work all day on your lap , and i m not surprised that he had one of these things. he always had the latest technology. i remember one time he had a device he could fit right in your pocket and i said hunter what is that and he said dad, i use that to smack smoke crack cocaine and i said way, i don t need to know what you re doing in your private life. just make sure i get 10 percent. perfect. but hey, his dad is right, afte all, everybody knows somebody somewhere along the line there. i bet everybody knows somebody somewhere along the line that in a relationship was happening was that guy takes a revealing picture of his naked friend or whatever in a