house was full of storage items, hard drives, computer devices, but also there were a vast amount of still pictures and videos stored on computers and on tapes. what police found was evidence that david fuller who had been a maintenance man at two hospitals in this part of kent, around tunbridge wells, that he had been sexually abusing dead bodies inside the mortuaries of the hospitals he worked at. he had been filming it himself and he had kept all of the footage he had filmed. he had carefully categorised it and catalogued it and he had stored it until the point where the police found it, taped to the back of a chest of drawers hidden inside a cupboard. that evidence was damning and also shocking and i ve spoken to the police officer whose job and also shocking and i ve spoken to the police officer whosejob it and also shocking and i ve spoken to the police officer whose job it is to look at pictures of child abuse in pursuit of child abusers and his
remember that brian laundrie allegedly returned to the house on september 1st. his parents reported on friday the 17th that he had been missing since tuesday the 14th so he s in that house for two weeks before he goes missing. primarily what the investigators will be looking for is anything he may have written, any recordings of his of his thoughts, of his if he wrote any notes, if he kept a journal. certainly any activity that he might have performed on computer devices so those are cell phones, tablets, desktop computers, anything that could access the internet, that could show searches that he may have performed, things of that nature. i m sure all of those devices are either being seized or mirrored on site where they take essentially a copy of everything that s on that machine and then they can go back and analyze that stuff in the lab later. they will be looking for forensic evidence. they will be looking for anything that he might have had
between general counsel james baker and the perkins couey law firm. that is correct. there is a specific report that james baker testified to house investigators that he had an unusual request or visit with a lawyer who happened to representative democrat national committee, and hired fusion gps and all that led to the fusion gps dossier used a target team trump. baker says it was the usual request and at the meeting he conveyed documents about the russia probe and some computer devices that had something to do with russia hacking. the law firm said the meeting wasn t about a representation to
conceded. however, it is unthinkable at least from the years that i cover the court and the judiciary to think that experienced prosecutors would accept this plea and put in the pleadings themselves, the language that they did without having corroboration to some extent from cohen s notes, from audio recordings, they have as we know millions of documents from the raid on his offices, on his computer devices so i think it s a fair assumption that his information has been checked out pretty well and when he says also we heard a bit of it ourselves in the audio recording that was released a couple weeks ago that both mr. giuliani and mr. avenatti and others have all discussed on the air.
foldering. you write an e-mail and safe as a draft and don t send them. others open that draft and read it and delete it. does this attract investigation s attentions and how were they able to get this information? certainly it attracted the attention of mueller s legal team. they thought that message implied some deceit in respect of communications. if they wanted to speak openly about something that wasn t perjuriry, why not send an e-mail. they interpretered it that way and they have the means available to them to receive all of those cell phone and other computer devices and they can retrieve that. the notion that the enkripgs on these whatsapp and other types of thing are such they can did b deny the opportunity for the prosecution to review them is