a decision is a minute. but the 4% of the special grand jury seems to be doing some of the da s cards. speaking to five different media outlets, that includes msnbc news. georgia law does not allow members of the grand jury to discuss until deliberations. they are a lot to speak openly about other aspects of the case. she has hinted that accountability is inevitable. she revealed the names of witnesses who testified, claimed some witnesses were granted immunity. she also said jurors listened to the phone call between trump georgia secretary of state, you know, when trump asked him to find 11,578 votes. jurors also heard testimony from the fake electors scandal to return she even revealed the grand jury recommended indicting over a dozen people. when it comes to indictments, here s what she told nbc s grant alexander. there definitely are some names that you expect. did the grand jury recommend an indictment of former president trump? i am not going to speak an exact i
i m lindsay reiser in for yasmin of a soup in. a terrifying attack in new york city. a suspect going after police with a machete. questions about why he did it. and the writing suddenly be tied to him. suspect in the midst of murders for college is not a whole mason be on the move. breaking news from capitol s this as republicans grapple with questions about incoming congressman and alleged serial liar george santos. surprising is from the white house involving a joint appearance for president biden and cinnamon art and leader mitch mcconnell. and donald trump brings in a new year. it starts with the doj investigation of the former president heating up a new revelations about his finances. all of that plus how things are looking for our wallets in the new year. i ll talk to an expert about where the economy is heading in 2023. that discussion ahead. we have some breaking news you want to get to. jess confirmed by nbc news. kevin mccarthy will hold a call today at 4 pm as
careful, did not recall some things that others recalled specifically. she did not denied them or call them purposefully. she was trying very hard to do minimum amount necessary without directly lying. barb, how different will it be for her and dared to speak to a grand jury? grand jury subpoenas, unlike congressional subpoenas have some real teeth. the prosecutors will ask questions, they will not take no for an answer. if they refused to answer questions they can get compulsion orders, there is even the prospect of being jailed if somebody defies a grand jury subpoena. i also think with someone like ivanka trump or jared kushner who are allied with the former president, the purpose of putting them in the grand jury is that there are so much to learn new things as they block them into a story. what you can t have happen is he present your case and then on the defense case, they come in and testify about things. they say, i was never asked
liability against others an exchange for cooperation. or immunized them and compel them to testify. they can refresh the recollection. they can confront them with statements that are made by other witnesses that contradict their testimony. although cassidy hutchinson herself probably can t testify about the events that occurred in the limousine in a trial because it would not be admissible under the rules of hearsay. she can lead doj prosecutors to other people who do have firsthand information. the doj can use things like phone records, compulsion orders, immunity, leverage to entice people to tell them the truth. they now because of the work of the committee have access to the information that provides those leads. this is just one aspect. if we kind of zoom out, what do you think the doj is likely doing right now with this entire trove of information? how much of a road map essentially is the committee offering the justice department here? i think it s tremendous. i think one th