been hit on before in the hugh hewitt interview. he was asked to be specific about some of these leaders. he claimed that, you know, hugh hewitt said it was great interview and spent a fair amount of time talking about how great the interview was but he had the opportunity last night, bret, at that to demonstrate he gotten a little bit more up to speed on these issues. here is part of his answer on that. so, i will say this though. hugh was giving me name after name, arab name, arab name and there are few people anywhere, anywhere that would have known those names. i think he was reading them off of a sheet. martha: can mauney was one of those names. zawahiri was one of those names, baghdadi was one of those names. are these issues on war or on terror voters should expect him to be up on or do voters like the fact they don t care? be clear, trump s supporters
going forward. the point is, that i had a bill and went nowhere. well, you re right, lindsey it went know where because we had a president back then for more comprehensive immigration reform than i was. george w. bush. that s right.
invoked i like to give him 30 seconds. jake, jake. jake, jake. governor bush. jake. you haven t heard. jake. we re going to as time goes on. thank you, dr. carson. bill: either jake or thank you senator. what did you hear the most? 11 contenders finally heard by each other and voters during the three-hour debate. in between the interruptions was there substance? howard kurtz, fox news media analyst and host of mediabuzz. how are you doing, howie. good morning to you. there will be a lot of analysis how cnn did last night. start it off. what do you think? i think we can all agree adding third hour was a little too long. late call by cnn. jake tapper did exactly what he advertised he was going to do which was to beg and poke and prod candidates to mix it up. and at times that produced some substantive exchanges.
folks would drop out so there would only be five or six standing up there. there is no reason for any of them to drop out right now. look, i for one, think carly fiorina, i think you will see movement in the polls. i think some of these people will go up u i m not sure trump will go down right now. but i think carly is going to go up. i think christie and rubio both did very well. so there is no real reason. even lindsey graham in the first, you know, in the smaller debate or forum, did, i think, really well. you could see him come i don t know if he did well enough to come up in the polls but there is no reason yet for anybody to get out. there is one outrage. the outrage jim gilmore was not included. former governor of virginia. party chairman, republican national committee chairman and party should have insisted he be in that debate. martha: sorry, we re up against a hard break. good to see you as you always. bill: will a court mark shall be
first one is what? go? army, military is trying to counter this hugely-large effort by the white house to inappropriately influence chain of command. look, bill, from day one, people knew this guy walked away. we know he did something to support the enemy. that is why you have the desertion and article 99. that is number one. number two, this has been uphill battle for the army to do what is necessary to get this. and his team, the bergdahl defense team keeps trying to throw trump in there and fox news in there saying there is inappropriate, you know, discussion, basically, trying to convince their guy in the media. bill, the facts speak for themselves. that is what the big issue is for today. this is hearing for the facts. bill: you also had a rose guarden ceremony too. right. bill: don t forget about that. what do you think ultimately what happens to bergdahl? this is grand jury justification, going through the facts making sure the actual charge meets the evidence and goes for