and totally inappropriate for durham to be opining. talking about an ongoing investigation they re conducting. that is not what the fbi does. this is very much in comports with what is saying. and barr to do what he s doing. this is what he did for the mueller report. he came out and in a very deliberate way misled in my view, deceived the public. he s acting as the president s attorney and this message is for the president. totally. that s why it s dangerous. we expect the attorney general to uphold the law of the country and the constitution. we have an attorney general who is first instinct always is protect the president. that should concern all of us. we have a justice department and the person who is the highest ranking legal person in the country doing the bidding of the president. it s just so scary. yet today the president came
investigation they re conducting. that is not what the fbi does. this is very much in comports with what is saying. and barr to do what he s doing. this is what te did for the mueller report. he came out and in a very deliberate way misled in my view, deceived the public. he s acting as the president s attorney and this message is for the president. totally. that s why it s dangerous. we expect the attorney general to uphold the law of the country and the constitution. we have an attorney general who is first instinct always is protect the president. that should concern all of us. we have a justice department and the person who is the highest ranking legal person in the country doing the bidding of the president. it s just so scary. yet today the president came out and said that what this report says is that things were
actors. it has become a hodgepodge. when the president speaks about it he s talking about the server and the crowd strike. a confusing mess. at its core this idea it s ukraine interfering not russians. that was the goal of russian intelligence to get into the american bloodstream. they appear to have succeeded. what do you think of the reporting? it s right on. without having seen or heard the briefing this comports exactly with what the russians would do. right after i think this all started about february of 2017. right after we publish our assessment saying russians meddled. well, what the russians do was try to deflect. put the blame on somebody else.
the russians. that was the goal of russian intelligence to get that into the american bloodstream, and they appear to have succeeded. i want to bring back in director james clapper. what do you think of matthew s reporting? i think it s right on. without having seen or heard the briefing this comports exactly with what the russians would do. right after i think this all started about february of 17. right after, you know, we published our intelligence community assessment saying the russians meddled. well, what the russians would do was try to deflect, put the blame on somebody else. and from putin s standpoint he s succeeded on two fronts. one he helps drive a wedge between ukraine and the united states, which is very important to him. because he doesn t want a democracy right on the edge of russia.
the next president will be. give me the lay of the land in your great state. the issue of impeachment has split our state, too. but that s relatively new. a few months ago in april there was a similar question posed in a poll here. about impeachment and removal. and i think only about 29% supported that idea at the time in april. now we re seeing about you know, 49% don t want to impeach or remove and 46 do. so you re seeing a split state. but that s, that also you know reveals a growing support for it as well. the data that i have, 51% say no, don t remove him from this. 44% say yes. that s in wisconsin and that s according to the marquette law school poll. that comports with the vibe that you re getting through your