the disunity makes us stronger. what is striking nobody bothered to explain exactly how. on friday night we asked the question, one of our jobs in this show is to ask questions that nobody else is asking. we believe that open debate is our birth right as americans but we also believe it produces wiser conclusion. we did, here s the clip. how precisely is diversity our strength? since you made this our new national motto, be specific as you explain it, can you think for example of other institutions such as, i don t know, marriage or military units, in which the less people have in common the more cohesive they are. do you get along benter with your neighbors or co-workers if you can t understand each other? or share no common values? well, it seems like obvious question to us and long-overdue. what rather than us the left called us names and tried to shut us up. you re racist they screamed as if that s a response rather than
in the presidential election. the clintons worked out for the clintons and nobody else. tucker: doesn t it, we only have a minute left and this is a deep question, but it did work out, they skated on everything, beat a bunch of legal charges and got incredibly rich. why aren t they happy? they re clearly so unhappy, why? because i think it s never enough. the whole point of them is just to get rich and richer and keep winning. bob smith who was my senator in new ham of shir at the time ham shir, he said he s won, he always wins, let s move o suddenly, they didn t win. and they can t stand it. and they want to keep coming back whether it s hillary or chelsea or whoever is next. it s the winning, it s the money, it s never enough. tucker: no, it never is. you think maybe you get on a certain age you get rich enough you would be happy. it s eluded them. great to see you, as always. thanks, tucker.
keep in mind this show has argued consistently in peru consistently for almost two years that people should never be punished or rewarded on the basis of their skin color. unlike the left, we don t believe your dna is the most inimportant thing about you. each of us as an individual, not a faceless member of a herd. the up or defining people by race. that is one of the main reasons we are not liberals. but maybe we are being too literal about this. our critics don t really think we are racists, they probably wouldn t care if we were. still aton is progressive and good standing. bigotry obviously is no barrier to entry on the left. none of this is actually about race at all. they are trying to silence us becausee they don t want to answer a question and they don t want to answer because they don t have an answer to it. think about that. america is a country the size of a continent with 325 million people in it. what holds all of that together? what is the glue? it certainly doesn t need
stronger. what is striking is that nobody has ever bothered to explain exactly how. so on friday night, we asked the question, one of ours jobs in te show was to ask questions that nobody else is asking. we believe that open debate is our birthright as americans but we also believe that it produces visor conclusions. so we did. here s the clip. how precisely his diversity our strength? since you ve made this our new national model, please be specific, as you explain it? can you think of other institutions, such as marriage or military units, and which the less people have in common, the more cohesive they are? do you get along better with your neighbors or coworkers if you can t understand each other? or share no common values? tucker: does it seem like obvious questions to us and long overdue questions. but rather than answer is, the left calls us names and try to shut us up. you are racist, they scream, as if that were a response ratherpo than a tactic.
how did that happen? how did records, in the preelectronic records day, wend their way, not just out of the rose law firm offices in littling ro, arkansas, but to the private residence of the president and the first lady. my i was haunted by what did vince foster do as the deputy counsel to the president, he took his own life. we knew that he was depressed, we had very significant evidence that he was clinically depressed. why was he clinically depressed? complex question but that s why i was haupted, why did this successful, bright lawyer take his own life within six months of the administration taking power. and that haunts me to this day. tucker: yeah, well you aren t the only one, for sure. ken starr, great to see you after all these years. thanks, tucker, appreciate you having me on. tucker: of course. mark steyn, right after the break, to talk about what is in ken starr s book and whatever