These programs going. On the table 4 page 19 we actually show the 15year amount for each contract over the 15year term the 6 contracts will be general fund costs and in the Human Services budget subject to board approval and note the variation in costs has more to do with the size of the project itself and the economies smaller housing development. We do recommend approval of these 6 resolutions these 6 agreements however we do based on our audit from 2012 at that time we found it was very hard for the board of supervisors to actually get good information on supportive housing. At that point in time these agreements were not being brought forward to to the to the board they werent subject to board approval. They are now providing verbal information to the board but also through these approvals of the local operating supportive agreements but our recommendation is to request the Mayors Office of housing to provide a written update and annual report to the board. Thank you. All right tha
Your leadership the Language Access Community Grants program. Then we have with us today our small but highly Competent Team of inhouse language specialists who id like them to stand up. Okay. So you can see we only have two fulltime chinese specialists one doubles as the outreach and Education Media and production coordinator and then we have one spanish person speaking person whose position is temporary wed love to make her permanent and one filipino tagalo speaker who is also our research and a backup spanish interpreter. Shes the unit leader and supervisor and our lao Compliance Officer and in addition to serving as our analyst and my right hand and everything else. Then the Community Ambassador Program Assistant who is a fulltime Program Assistant is the asneeded russian interpreter so we have the capability of specialists who do both interpretation and translation work and this is really rare because these are entirely different skill sets. The unit is overwhelmed i have to be ho
Mirrors the numbers from the acs Population Estimates again 87 percent of the client served by tier one departments are chinese and Spanish Speaking with the majority 48 percent chinese and point 02 percent speak tagalo theres a slight difference in the numbers reported by tier one departments having russian slightly higher at point 03 percent but that could be because of the Services Provided or the requests that are made. And as you know our leo is a very robust ordinance with tier 1, 26 main departments and tier 2 which are all the rest of the departments that service the public and in general all departments are supposed to comply with the ordinance and 26 departments have to submit an annual report over 18 data points every year which include Data Tracking budget policies and procedures in general and other items. The leo compliance methodology is year round and its an activity thats year round for ocf. In general want to share with you some trends. We have a hundred percent compl
Process. Determination of substantial number of thresholds by obtaining evidence from reliable data sources such as the American Community survey or anything else that we can get our hands on that is being validated information and validate this information having it analyzed by by the San Francisco Planning Department and compare with previously published data studies. The step may include a Baseline Study if there is no Information Available or the margin of error places the threshold in question as in the case of filipino where there was a difference in the threshold and certification after we validate the data we issue written notification to all City Departments as with the original amendment in 2009, 18 months to implement citywide. Were very pleased this year to to be able to certify filipino as a language. Now the margin of error is plus or minus 930 and this is the specific reason why ocea wanted to do a Baseline Study. And at that time the 2000 census provided a lot more deta
Information available or the margin of error places the threshold in question as in the case of filipino where there was a difference in the threshold and certification after we validate the data we issue written notification to all City Departments as with the original amendment in 2009, 18 months to implement citywide. Were very pleased this year to to be able to certify filipino as a language. Now the margin of error is plus or minus 930 and this is the specific reason why ocea wanted to do a baseline study. And at that time the 2000 census provided a lot more detailed information there were a hundred questions on the long form and changed the process of collection collecting data in 2010 with only 10 short questions on the census form so it didnt give us any information and this is why we felt in order for City Departments to properly provide Language Services to the filipino population the study was necessary. Just to share with you quickly the methodology for the study is 3 fold.