plus his name would have been in the news. it looks to me like he was a kid one of the many volunteers in there. he was in a photo op with these volunteers the president spoke about him specifically. he was authorized by paul manafort to have meetings with russians. you can characterize him in whatever way you like, he was important enough to have those conversations. everything we have shows that those meetings were not accepted and the campaign did not not by the campaign. he said they were approved by the campaign. i don t know that they were approved, erin. there were seven e-mails where he asked to set up meetings, and six of them before we go, i want to ask you, paul about tony podesta, brother of the clinton campaign chairman, john bow december ta now stepping aside from his lobbying firm, he s doing so because of these charges. he s referred to company b in paul manafort s indictment.
now, increasing their business with the iranians. what the north koreans are learning, you can get around the sanctions. the evidence shows in the first five months of this year alone, we ve had trade increase 40% between north korea and china, iron ore specifically is up over 200% trade, this is a significant problem. we already know the north koreans have enough material, plutonium and uranium to make more than a few bombs, more than a few nukes. they have tested 11 times this year. we need to throw down resolutions at the security council that tighten up the sanctions immediately on iron ore. i d say the u.s. congress needs to implement banking sanctions on china, not an specific companies. because we know once you try to sanction company a, then company b pops up.
the only increase in stock price was a 7% jump the day they fired her. in fact the minute they fired her the stock jumped 10%. it closed up 7%. but basically, she lost $60 billion of shareholder wealth. she won t acknowledge that. employment? there s 30,000 jobs less. she had jobs from company a, jobs from company b, putting them together doesn t create more jobs. if you have massive layoffs on top of that. and the only jobs she created were offshore. she was not creating any american jobs. and patents. she had all these decrepit old patents that came from compaq and digital equipment that were decayed and dusty and never used. anything she bought has been shuttered or divested. this is a complete fraud. and this is amazing that people don t care about the facts. and by the way, do you have to be a business success to be a great ceo? no. commander in chief. she tells us to evaluate her on the basis of only this job. since she s had no other job. if she was so great and vindicated by ti
was a 7% jump the day they fired her. in fact the minute they fired her the stock jumped 10%. it closed up 7%. but basically, she lost $60 billion of shareholder wealth. she won t acknowledge that. employment? there s 30,000 jobs less. she had jobs from company a, jobs from company b, putting them together doesn t create more jobs. if you have massive layoffs on top of that. and the only jobs she created were offshore. she was not creating any american jobs. and patents. she had all these decrepit old patents that came from compaq and digital equipment that were decayed and dusty and never used. anything she bought has been shuttered or divested. this is a complete fraud. and this is amazing that people don t care about the facts. and by the way, do you have to be a business success to be a great ceo? no. commander in chief. she tells us to evaluate her on the basis of only this job. since she s had no other job. if she was so great and vindicated by time, how come nobody s given her a
she bought company, it was worth 50 cents by the time they fired her. the only increase in stock price was a 7% jump the day they fired her. in fact, the minute they fired her the stock jumped 10%. it closed up 7%. but basically, she lost $60 billion of shareholder wealth. she won t acknowledge that. employment? there s 30,000 jobs less. she had jobs from company a, jobs from company b, putting them together doesn t create more jobs. if you have massive layoffs on top of that. and the only jobs she created were offshore. she was not creating any american jobs. and patents. she had all these decrepit old patents that came from compaq and digital equipment that were decayed and dusty and never used. anything she bought has been shuttered or divested. this is a complete fraud. and this is amazing that people don t care about the facts. and by the way, do you have to be a business success to be a great ceo? no. commander in chief. she tells us to evaluate her on the basis of only this job.