Benefit for people walking along and enjoying the embarcadero why are you against it. Were using a no vote on prop b and c. Number one it changes the height all along this particle of the waterfront to almost double the size the freeway that was torn down. It also is bulky as a favorable field so instead of opening up the waterfront as argue walking along the waterfront a lot of your views of acquit r coit tower will be restricted. Number 3 it increases the heights along the waterfront because theres 3 other particles along the north waterfront. F it destroys the tense club its been use that i thousands of san franciscans for years and its being built too close to a sewer line with great risks to the sewer line. Height, bulk, sewer risk, precedent. And then to on top of it in prop b which is written by the developer the developer he gets special rules to approve his project. If this isnt enough to vote no on b and c i think it is mr. Barb theres been some confusion regarding prop b and
Buildings with a total of 1 hundred 21 to nine hundred 41 units and there the building from 84 feet up to 1 hundred and 36 feet. A privately owned a height of 6 stories along embarcadero and payment for the housing fund a public park and open spaces and sidewalks on at least 20 percent of the site and new case to the waterfront and ground floor retail and cafes and under gown car and bicycle parking and increased revenue to the port and city. If you vote yes open prop b you want to approve the 8 Development Site if you vicinity no on prop b i dont want to approve the washington Street Development project. Im here with alec the proponent of propose b and c ambassador were also joined by on opponent of the measure id like to a start with mr. Barb why are you for this as opposed to. Im for the proposition because i cared about the San Francisco project using the waterfront i see this as an opportunity to open up the waterfront by opening up streets that were closed in the dark redevelopme
Pharmaceuticals are going to take a lost. A lot of Companies Run into those problems and jill adjourn scientific nicole worked out well, theyre new drugs is a combination of four different drugs they put together. I understand the aids foundation they want to cut prices on the other hand, they have the next drug to be developed theyre to need money for it. If we cut back too much its going to cost lives and result. We have the best medical establishment in the world if we want to cut down its goes to cost lives. Its a vow judgment. Adjust price has been discussions and kissing restraining order the roman order sdutdz it but in this case, the Drug Companies need the kind of medical research we need. Some use the fact to invade our patent and do cut rate versions of our drugs. If we didnt go ahead and do our medical research a lot of drugs wont exist and a lot of people would die a lot yearns. In the earlier 1 hundreds people live about 47 years old. Im 4r50rgd to living to about 80. Ive
Happen. I have to compensate our Research Companies otherwise theyre not going to be in the field and costs lives. This is the position of the house and a senate 33 they have to encourage the companies in order to save lives. Ms. Kelly while this sound like a great change many people are reluctant to building theyll see a difference i really want to talk about would the opponent of this just said. I dont have the money to buy drugs myself. I also dont have the money to buy stock in Drugs Companies on let me just tell you something the ceos make hundreds of millions of dollars. Theres enough money for r d. Every year those companies are a profit and every year more people cant afford their medication. Theres a difference between being very rich and ridiculously rich. This gentleman says that Congress Wants the pharmacies so have the money and Congress Wants money from the pastes to keep returning for offices. They spend more money on politics and fighting against thienl that are spent o
Best pharmaceutical companies in the world. A lot of Companies Lose a lot of money but i can guarantee i our pharmaceuticals are going to take a lost. A lot of Companies Run into those problems and jill adjourn scientific nicole worked out well, theyre new drugs is a combination of four different drugs they put together. I understand the aids foundation they want to cut prices on the other hand, they have the next drug to be developed theyre to need money for it. If we cut back too much its going to cost lives and result. We have the best medical establishment in the world if we want to cut down its goes to cost lives. Its a vow judgment. Adjust price has been discussions and kissing restraining order the roman order sdutdz it but in this case, the Drug Companies need the kind of medical research we need. Some use the fact to invade our patent and do cut rate versions of our drugs. If we didnt go ahead and do our medical research a lot of drugs wont exist and a lot of people would die