Am allow in person attendance approximate Public Comment providing Remote Access via phone. Will take Public Comment by each item in person will be allowed to speak first then to the remote phone line. For those watching channel 26, 28, 78 or 99 and sfgov. Org the call in number is streaming. The number is 4156550001. Upon eshd meeting id 2485 132 7480 when connected you hear the discussions but in listening mode only. When your item come up and Public Comment is called those in person line up near the curtains and those on the phone line should dial star 3 to be added to the queue f. You are on your phone remember to turn down your television and listening device. As already indicated. Will take Public Comment attends nothing person first and then we move on to our remote call in line. You may submit comment in the following ways e mail myself erica. Major sfgov. Org if testimony be forwarded not supervisors and made part of the official file byus postal to city hall 1 doctor carlton
Denham, an chairman schuster laid the groundwork in 2006 when his postkarina reform act authorized fema to conduct a number of recovery programs. Costs of dramatically reduced, projects were completed faster and the process was more efficient. Without making permanent the debris removal program, the taxpayer could pay six times the cost of debris removal and it could take much longer. The individuals and households Pilot Program incorporated in this bill would reduce costs by a similar amount and make temporary Housing Available faster. In hearing after hearing before our committee experts, fema and the Inspector Generals Office have all testified communities will be rebuilt faster and taxpayers will save hundreds of millions of dollars with this bill. We know the current process is broken and we finally know how to fix it but we have to change the law by march or it will be too late to apply lessons to Sandy Recovery. Its been nearly eight years since Hurricane Katrina and there are s
The union labor heavily involved in this build out project. And i can also say for the rest of the community coalition, that is working for clean power sf and making it strong that we also concur with the statement that the sierra club put out and so the grassroots organizizers out here are strongly, supportive and would be deeply concerned about a program that did not maximize to the greatest extent possible the union labor on the project. When the projects were then programmed. And that is paramount and it is just smart for us to take that position and even though i am a solid Union Supporter but it is wise for us to take that position because together we can make sure that this Program Becomes what it ought to become. Which is hundreds of megawatts of local installation and hiring the California Workers to make this city a green city. And started bringing in a deal for this country and if we get it done here it will spread. And the union labor is going to be key to that and so i wan
And annual report. And they will give us a very specific information and so that i think it gets us, very where we need to go and i dont expect, some of the boat house folks will be happy, with our saying that rec and park is responsible for recreation. But where we are going to disagree and i think that is an appropriate out come. And we have distributed with the package and we had the mlu and a resolution to put that in force. We have introduced some changes to the language of the mlu. And sitting next to our counsel, i have been handed an amendment to the resolution. Which will make the rest of it happen if i get this right. And that is your amendment is not in the resolution. It is not. But you are incorporating it if yeah. All right. So we are incorporating mr. Ritchis amendment and Vice President courtneys amendments . Yes. And the, just a minute. The word is. Right here. Okay. So, first of all, if i could move the item so that then i could move the amendment to it. Do you want t
Detail on what the actual work plan will be moving forward. Great. Eif you address those two questions, that would be great, thank you. Thank you, scott james, general manager, and the Parks Department and first of all we are grateful for this commission and Department Staff for your partnership and a number of properties that we Work Together and to provide the activities which is our joint and shared mission, we worked closely with the department and the Department Staff over a number of months and we have viewer feedback and the veriable amount of fee back to reach and formalize a refresh which we are comfortable with and pleased to be here today. With respect to the two questions, that you raised commissioner, one bond planning, we have begun in earnest our 2012, park bond planning it is 185 million bond with two million assigned to the lake merced and there have been Staff Meetings as we have done with the different sites to prepare for it and we have an assessment happening some