Money. If you ask me me to look up th law and determine if i am, thats going to show my contribution. So either put a threshold in or make it voluntary on the committee. As we get to each point of Public Comment on it, if you want to publicly comment on it and give your opinions on it. Well be happy to hear it. I dont think we can have this continued colloquy in regards im not blaming you for anything. I think its our fault. We got into it with you. When we get to the last part of this, which is supervisor peskins proposal, at that time, we would like to hear quite a bit from you. Okay . But until then, as we go through each of these amendments, dont keep coming up, unless theres a question. Im not faulting you for anything. Youre very helpful, but its better so we can get through these particular amendments if we all address it, the public addresses it, each one of those amendments, and you address it and give your opinion on these amendments as well. Otherwise, what youve done so far
Support or oppose. They had to do that in 2002. So i drew your attention specifically to what mr. Bush has referred to, and hopefully that will be part of the amendment youre going to make on this section, which i assume youre going to do by seriotum. Yes. Good. Thank you. Any Public Comment by the commissioners before we vote on the amendment . In response to both mr. Bush or stellar, is there any reason why we dont say . Commissioner, could you please step up to the microphone . Is there any reason why we dont say for or against . If its a contribution to a committee against a candidate, that it also has the same requirement of a donor or is there a presumption they have to get a card from the donor, making certain representations. I would be happy to accept that as i think it might be helpful if we could have a specific reference to what section or line of the draft the Public Comment is suggesting we amend. 11. 145. For clarification, 11. 145a, thats on the table. B is not on the t
Charter amendment in 2001 that did, in fact, say, any advocacy by the City Attorney is prohibited on the year in which hes on the ballot, whatever the provision was. It was on the modification of the election law in setting up the elections commission. So you have to added add support or oppose. They had to do that in 2002. So i drew your attention specifically to what mr. Bush has referred to, and hopefully that will be part of the amendment youre going to make on this section, which i assume youre going to do by seriotum. Yes. Good. Thank you. Any Public Comment by the commissioners before we vote on the amendment . In response to both mr. Bush or stellar, is there any reason why we dont say . Commissioner, could you please step up to the microphone . Is there any reason why we dont say for or against . If its a contribution to a committee against a candidate, that it also has the same requirement of a donor or is there a presumption they have to get a card from the donor, making cer
There a presumption they have to get a card from the donor, making certain representations. I would be happy to accept that as i think it might be helpful if we could have a specific reference to what section or line of the draft the Public Comment is suggesting we amend. 11. 145. For clarification, 11. 145a, thats on the table. B is not on the table, so i dont think that should be part of the discussion. Why is that . Chair keen gave the recommendation that people only talk about what is in front of this body on the individual items. It is not agendized. It is certainly an agenda item. The whole ordinance is an agenda item. I dont understand saying its only the proposed changes. Maybe im wrong. I think youre both right in terms of that. What youre saying is in regard kyle is right, that what were taking up now is the amendment and the language of the amendment, which is at page two. Right. Thats what were doing. What youre suggesting is in regards to things mr. Bush has said, that the
There a presumption they have to get a card from the donor, making certain representations. I would be happy to accept that as i think it might be helpful if we could have a specific reference to what section or line of the draft the Public Comment is suggesting we amend. 11. 145. For clarification, 11. 145a, thats on the table. B is not on the table, so i dont think that should be part of the discussion. Why is that . Chair keen gave the recommendation that people only talk about what is in front of this body on the individual items. It is not agendized. It is certainly an agenda item. The whole ordinance is an agenda item. I dont understand saying its only the proposed changes. Maybe im wrong. I think youre both right in terms of that. What youre saying is in regard kyle is right, that what were taking up now is the amendment and the language of the amendment, which is at page two. Right. Thats what were doing. What youre suggesting is in regards to things mr. Bush has said, that the