15111 the subsection you are referring to says classes that include the history of a subgroup. That would suggest a class in mexicanamerican history. That is not just including, but about that. And it is likely most of the students would sign up for that would be mexicanamericans, and that seems to run afoul of subpart three. I dont think it runs afoul of subpart three unless it is designed for the purpose of separating out those students and teaching a separate history that is not applicable to all the students in that school or that district. I am not maybe not following you, and it may be my fault. What is an example of a course that would not violate one, two four, but would violate three and therefore would be prohibited . If you had a class that is designed for one ethnicity for the purpose of separating them out, the irish, the germans, jews, asians, but is not about that group. Im not quite sure what you mean by purposes of separating them out unless you are talking about numbe
Need in that context if the world believes we were not serious about negotiations. So i take this very seriously. I dont question the good faith of some folks who think this might be helpful. But it is my team that is at the table. We are deep in this stuff day in and day out. We dont make judgments blindly. We have been working on this for 5, 6, 7 years. We consult closely with allies like the United Kingdom and in making those assessments. Im asking congress to hold off because our negotiators, our partners, those who are are most intimately involved in this, assess that it will jeopardize the possibility of providing a diplomatic solution to one of the most difficult and long lasting National Security problems that we have faced in a very long time. And Congress Needs to show patience. So, with respect to the veto, i said to my Democratic Caucus colleagues yesterday that i will veto a bill that comes to my desk. And i will make this argument to the American People as to why i am doi
District, give you a 75 lets get a faith district, give you 75 africanamericans, and what it did was remove africanamericans from surrounding districts so that democrats would have no chance that would be no coalitions possible. You have to do we will different types of gerrymandering, one was racial gerrymandering, primarily in the south, which republicans play to their advantage, and the second was in the north and the midwest, which was raw political power to draw as many districts as we can. The problem is that can change. Every 10 years there is a new senses, new redistricting, and who is to say the democrats cannot control posted the next time around and use gerrymandering against the republicans . What we suggested is lets have Bipartisan Commissions in every state where you get together. Right now, there are five states where you do that and those states, those districts are more competitive. Arizona, california, iowa, new jersey washington, you have more competitive seats this
Interviews are available online. If you enjoyed this one, here are some others you might like, laura ingram, bill kristol and ingrid ferguson, former speechwriter for george h. W. Bush. You can watch them all at www. Cspan. Org. Monday night on the communicators, special counsel for the fcc on chairman tom wheelers proposal for net neutrality, including her regulating the internet like a utility. I do not know what the next fcc chairman will do. He may try to throb this whole regime and do something that is less regulatory. I do not really by the next chairman argument. The rules are only as good as the guy or gal on the eighth floor in forcing them. So we have to do our best in setting up an infrastructure that will protect consumers, preserve and over and open internet, the greatest driver of innovation this world has ever known. Wednesday night on cspan2. Coming up, Prime Minister David Cameron takes questions from members of the house of commons. Former Florida Governor jeb bush ta
World to continue stepping up with resources that are required so we simply do not stop this disease, we do more to prevent future epidemics. Much of our discussion focused on the continuing threat of terrorism. In the wake of the vicious attacks in paris as well as the new surfacing out of belgium today we continue to stand unequivocally not only with our french friends and allies, but with also all of our partners who are dealing with this scourge. I know david joins me when i say we will continue to do everything we can in our power to help france seek the justice that is needed, and all our countries are working together seamlessly to prevent attacks and defeat these terrorist networks. With our combat mission in afghanistan over, we are focused with our nato allies on assisting and equipping Afghan Forces to secure their own country and deny al qaeda any safe haven there. And we will continue to count on Great Britain as one of our strongest counterterrorism partners. We are syste