Both nc t to apply the lot restrictions and the one Additional Planning Commission modifications for the fillmore street to rezone two properties nc one, two rto the recommend go administrations we are recommended at the hearing one speaker who seemed to be adverse to my change. In the fillmore because of the areas troubled history with the redevelopment history the questions were based on lot area and supervisor wiener express his support and the racked density controls the Committee Voted Unanimously to with a positive recommendation this weeks board of supervisors was scald for the commissioner richards i supported the rezone and theres a car wash there one acre its been sold and development there project sponsor will double the units from 3 avoiding to plus housing no Affordable Housing fees that Large Development has to pay; is that correct. Nothing particular mr. To the ordinance no. A cynical person wow. Is where he a windfall Public Policy dictates there are impacts and that co
Inclusionary requirement has always explicitly included Group Housing. But at many point, the Planning Department made an unofficial determination that Group Housing was not subject to the Inclusionary Housing Program. However, this determination was never formalized in a written Zoning Administrator determination, which could have been appealed to the board of appeals. Therefore, we only recently became aware of this unofficial policy. And recently developed and proposed a number of marketrate Group Housing projects that have brought to light the fact that the Planning Department is currently not requiring them to comply with Inclusionary Housing Program. So this ordinance clarifies that the Planning Department is to follow the original language of the Inclusionary Housing Program, and apply it to Group Housing. I believe we have staff, who are also here from the Planning Department to present. And i believe we also have some amendments that i believe you will be prepared to talk abou
As i said many times before, 60 of the San Francisco residents qualify for Affordable Housing in the city. The board intended this program to apply to all units built, and explicitly stated that Group Housing was one of the types of housing which should apply under the inclusionary ordinance. It only became clear as supervisor avalos mentioned, to our office last year, that the Planning Department has been interpreting this ordinance differently because of a difference in how dwelling units are interpreted versus housesing units. And because Group Housing is not considered under the umbrella of dwelling units, the Zoning Administrator has therefore been interpreting our ordinance as excluding Group Housing from the policy. This cleanup legislation just explicitly makes clear that it is Group Housing as defined about under the housing code that is now included in inclusionary Housing Ordinance and not based on how we actually define dwelling units. 1178 folsom, two blocks within two blo
Housing and Group Housing both bmr Group Housing and nonbmr Group Housing in my view is a very important part of the mix. We need to make sure that were allowing various types to be built. I know at least one Group Housing project that was in the pipeline, when this legislation was introduced, converted to a more traditional apartment or condo building. They said it no longer penciled out for their financing and we lost a Group Housing project. I have heard from other Group Housing developers that it can pencil out. So i think its a little unclear here, but clearly having inclusionary Housing Ordinance apply to Group Housing does increase the costs of the projects. That is not to say that we shouldnt do it. I think the bmr program, our Inclusionary Housing Program is a very, very important one and one i support. What i would like to suggest, and after Public Comment i will make the motion to amend, that we have some additional flexibility in terms of ami. 50 of area Median Income and i
Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen please take our seats were going to begin id like to call this meeting into order of regular meeting of San Francisco Land Use Economic Development committee and supervisor wiener the vice chair. Of this committee joining us will be supervisor jane kim our clark and recognize Jessie Larson and leo who will be televising that on sfgov madam clerk, any announcements . Silence all electronic devices. Completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the july 28th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. All right. Thank you very much call item one. Item one an ordinance approving on agreement with the citys purchase between the 16 and 7th street. Ive before notified by dpw they need to conduct an additional Public Comment on this item and after we take public hearing illicit be making a motion to continue it please call tilt why not go ahead and take Public Comment is