and if it is , what should w we want to find someone who w could provide givean since tip answer, elon musk is the right person, he has beenpe thinking aboutrs it and worrying about it for his life, he helped found a nonprofit research project,pe the point was in the name, open a.i.ar ifti we have artificial intelligence it shouldre bnte t open, that io s open to the worl d. that was the idea. but as the years passedd musk and musk found himselfng a preoccupied building a couple of enormous companieoupls, spacx and tesla, open, i got awayn aig from him as of tonight.pen ai open i i is no longer open. it s not a nonprofit researchprc project dedicated to using artificial intelligencel to serve humanity. it is instead a commercialtell enterpriseigentin, backed by mio and controlled to some extent controby the democratic party.s elon musk thinks that s a problem. s thre in fact, hate believes it s a threat to human civilization, tantamount to maybe even mount more terrifying t
and if it is , what should wewe do about it?to those questions are significant enough that we wanted to find someone who could provide a definitive answer. elon mus k seemed like the right about person. musk has been thinking about a a.i. and worrying about it for most of his life. nearly a decade ago, hel he hele found a nonprofit research project called open a i. and the point was in the name,,n if we re going to have artificial intelligence and apparently we are, it ought to be open, open to the s use world that would help ensurer go that it s used for good and not evil. odotvil.that was the idea. but as the years passedd musk and musk found himselfng a preoccupied building a couple of enormous companieoupls, spacx and tesla, open, i got awayn aig from him as of tonight.pen ai open i i is no longer open. it s not a nonprofit researchprc project dedicated to using artificial intelligencel to serve humanity. it is instead a commercialtell enterpriseigentin, backed by mio a
But you never know with elon musk. Theres a lot going on, so i thought this might be a Good Opportunity to answer some questions and maybe get some feedback, too. What should we be doing different . I know the bbc, for example, was not thrilled about being labelled state affiliated media. N ot exa ctly. I was going to get that later, but lets go for it now. It has officially objected to that term. Do you want to respond to it . Yeah, yeah. Our goal is simply to be as truthful and accurate as possible, so i think we are adjusting the label to be publicly funded, which i think is perhaps not too objectionable. Were trying to be accurate. I am not the bbc, but. Publicly funded is how the bbc describes itself. So, that would be accurate. If we use the same words that the bbc uses to describe itself, that, presumably, would be ok. I am not asking you for a yes or no, because you are not running the bbc per se, but it seems to pass a reasonability test. So youre going to change those labels
so called smart motorways which use measures such as variable speed limits to improve traffic flows. fourteen stretches of carriageway have already been paused or cancelled because of concerns over costs and safety. at ten o clock we will be here with a full round up of the day s news. first, the interview: elon musk. it s not every day you get invited by one of the world s richest and most influential people to a sit down interview. earlier on tuesday, i d received a response to an e mailfrom mr musk. let s do an interview tonight, it read. just a few short hours later, we were setting up in twitter s headquarters in san francisco. hello, how are you doing? really nice to meet you, too. we are about to go live, very surprisingly, we only just found this out, on twitter, that that is elon musk. we didn t know about that, but you never know with elon musk. there s a lot going on, so i thought this might be a good opportunity to answer some questions and maybe get some fe
but you never know with elon musk. there s a lot going on, so i thought this might be a good opportunity to answer some questions and maybe get some feedback, too. what should we be doing different? i know the bbc, for example, was not thrilled about being labelled state affiliated media. n ot exa ctly. i was going to get that later, but let s go for it now. it has officially objected to that term. do you want to respond to it? yeah, yeah. our goal is simply to be as truthful and accurate as possible, so i think we are adjusting the label to be publicly funded, which i think is perhaps not too objectionable. we re trying to be accurate. i am not the bbc, but. publicly funded is how the bbc describes itself. so, that would be accurate. if we use the same words that the bbc uses to describe itself, that, presumably, would be ok. i am not asking you for a yes or no, because you are not running the bbc per se, but it seems to pass a reasonability test. so you re going to change