Suggestions as to what could be done to improve it. Thank you. Okay. Well i would like to follow that up and what has done to protect this project from the marsh theatre. So in the past, prior to the latest ceqa appeal, the sponsor did higher and acoustic cult consultant and they also took other efforts. They eliminated the roof depth feature out of response of noise. They limited construction hours and you may have seen in the approval to address the theatres schedule and incorporated in the design to design between the adjacent buildings. Im happy to go what some of those are as well as well as the items raised by the marsh earlier. The project sponsor has agreed to the items shown on the lefthand column. Thank you very much. What about the right hand column . The right hand columns have been propose fwied marsh but not agreed to buy the by the parties. So rejected . Yes. Can you address the mandated Community Liaison and when did that come on . Mark, the project sponsor is acting as
Everything. Please come to the marsh. It is such a great resource. My daughter has been involved for the last decade at the marsh. I wouldnt send her anywhere else. Thank you. Miss gallagher, i have several questions. How would you characterize the acoustical capacity of the marshs building . Im sorry, i didnt get that . How would you characterize the building that the marsh is in in terms of its ability to lock sounds from the adjacent properties . Its in pretty sad shape. We wish of were better. This is a nonprofit organization. It puts just about every cent it has into providing these sliding scales and Free Services to the community. We need a lot of money. One of the comments made by the permit holder was that this used to be a nightclub . It was forced to have provided a number of different Acoustical Solutions to reduce its nuisance value . I think stephanie can speak to that. I dont know too much about that. I think the acoustical done by my office is some corkboard. Thats abou
I have known sarah stein for several years. That is where i saw firsthand the talent that sarah stein embodis and how she works with her children and the challenge of really wanting to learn really thrives. We followed sarah to polka dot preschool and my younger son attended throughout his years there, who just started kindergarten. And i attribute fully to sarah stein and polka dot that they were both ready for kindergarten and thriving within an Immersion Program within the San Francisco unified school district. It was lawrence and sarah that created that foundation for wanting to learn. I recognize there are concerns from the neighbors in potrero on harvard street. We have heard directly from the concerns through the Community Meeting around traffic, noise and parking. I think from the testimony you have already heard tonight sarah and lawrence take this very seriously. They are planners and as you saw from your planning packet, they have a plan to mitigate and be able to be a Good
Almost 10 decibels lower. Third, the marsh believes a bar would create conflicts from the getgo. It also would help prevent us from setting a relation with the building and conditional use hearings and finally the special restrictions to record these conditions. I just want to end with a point that we just become aware of. That is these projects coming through ascribed as having onsite affordability. They are coming back and paying their way outside the affordability. This is permitted bylaw and i encourage you to talk about this. These skyrocketing fees for these units are making it more affordable to buy their way out of this process. Affordable housing already lags and allows them to pay an affordable system and paying onsiten insures this lag between affordability and new market rate construction is going to become even more disparate. The second point Affordable Housing is to include the Affordable Housing onsite. It was to provide two affordable units onsite. The marsh, the missi
In the mark theatre and some suggestions as to what could be done to improve it. Thank you. Okay. Well i would like to follow that up and what has done to protect this project from the marsh theatre. So in the past, prior to the latest ceqa appeal, the sponsor did higher and acoustic cult consultant and they also took other efforts. They eliminated the roof depth feature out of response of noise. They limited construction hours and you may have seen in the approval to address the theatres schedule and incorporated in the design to design between the adjacent buildings. Im happy to go what some of those are as well as well as the items raised by the marsh earlier. The project sponsor has agreed to the items shown on the lefthand column. Thank you very much. What about the right hand column . The right hand columns have been propose fwied marsh but not agreed to buy the by the parties. So rejected . Yes. Can you address the mandated Community Liaison and when did that come on . Mark, the