Okay we are back and ready for Public Comment. Thank you for the brief moment to gather my thoughts and talk with my staff. So Public Comment is now open. And i have a few cards and if first you come in the order your name is called by card, and then anyone else who hasnt filled out a card can come in behind. So first up is trevor martin. Amber actually, lets go first to people representing other people, who were to speak. Amber was here ufcw and others here will be the first people to speak, since you are speaking on behalf of actual candidates. And then well go on to the cards, okay. Thank you. Amber bauer, district director for uscw here on behalf of jim araby. He will no longer be applying for if that set and wed like to separate jan garcia in her application for this commission. Thank you. And your application actually just came in after the deadline. It did. Im Jennifer Garcia with ufcw in San Francisco and the application was in late. My local just recently got the Cannabis Divi
Is when was that number presented to you by the sheriff . This was when the comptroller forecast was released. The 2015 forecast that estimated bed need between 120 and 393. We previously installed 512 beds. What we did with that, we took out two pods. Hes pod had 64 beds in each pod. Taking out 128 was almost half of the floor. We were able to reduce that to 384 to still fit within it. The comptroller gave a range of 120 . Did you do an estimate for what the cost would be if it was 120 . Well, we did the cost for 256 beds. Which was midrange. I think from the Sheriffs Department, even the he can speak to what the needs are. I understand that. If the comptroller had a range of 120 to 393 why wouldnt you a set of alternatives that looked at the entire range . The alternatives that we presented was the one that met the Sheriffs Department requirement. As my understanding at that time was 120 beds would not meet the requirement. In your analysis, youre aware that the Sheriffs Department i
Let them since in carbon that policy within make its way into the way we apply those pesticides well be applying them less the more will you please theyll sing the carbon more of a balance from what the evasive and some of the considerations i feel your list gets applied with our partners at Different Department and the workers he you dont i dont think if we write that language those National Area plans will super keyed our element for the to say with he cant put guiding promises a great opportunity you know because weve talked about that having the National Areas conversation and the mifgs mifgsz moifgs and certainly ways we address climatic change commissioner wald basically i want to thank you for that comment josh because i think that it is absolutely correct i think that we should sort of strait if i thotify tho weird may not be the right word but the unique things of the department of environment a great many mandates by the city and county of San Francisco and very little of the
Short and well be joined by Scott Sanchez the Zoning Administrator who represents the Planning Department and Planning Commission and joe duffy representing the department of Electronic Devices are prohibited. Out in the hallway. Permit holders and others have up to 7 minutes to present their case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes, participants not affiliated have up to 3 minutes no rebuttal. To assist the board in the accurate preparation of the minutes, members of the public are asked, not required to submit a speaker card or Business Card to the clerk. Speaker cards and pens are available on the left side of the podium. If you have a question about the schedule, speak to the staff after the meeting or call the board office tomorrow we are located at 1650 mission street, suite 304. This meeting is broadcast live on sfgovtv cable channel 78. Dvds are available to purchase directly from sfgovtv. Thank you for
Continuance for september 10, 2015, but i believe we discussed that to september 24th at this point. Any Public Comment on item the one item proposed for continuance not seeing Public Comment is closed. Commissioner richards move to continue item one to accepted 24 on that motion to continue item one to september 24th commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places us under the consent calendar for items 2, 3 a and 3 b i do have one speaker cards for item 2 a mic a ma sell florlz we will is have to place it in others regular calendar. Items 2 and 3. Right for the San Francisco west side kriejdz Environmental Impact report okay. Well have to pull that off of content and put it on the regular calendar that pulls 3 a and b off consent we cant act until the Environmental Impact report is soundproofed. Okay. Thats outlook. Shall we pl