in the state s implementation of immigration law? i think this was the most important provision of it, where they get to actually ask them whether they are here legally, or not, and the supreme court ruled that they then can let the federal authorities know that they have somebody who is here illegally in the country. this is important, to be able to now point out to the federal government, hey, we have people here who are here illegally, do something about it? do you want us to hold them. if the ra the federal government says yes we want you to hold them, they can hold them and it puts pressure on federal government to do something about it. jamie: that s real tricky. because the real point governor brewer had to bringing this and signing it into law is because she felt the federal government was not enforcing immigration law. and the court on the other three parts of this felt there was a
that holder hasn t apologized. there has been closure. the program has been shut down. bill: is a clearly is not stopping. we ll see if there is a resolution. there is a possibility there could be an accommodation on both sides. kirsten, we ll bring you back for a one-on-one with hume at 1:00. we call that round two. jamie: big news over the weekend. the muslim brotherhood making history in egypt, and not necessarily the best kind for the united states. the live picture of tahrir square in cairo. new moves by an islamic president causing worry in washington. plus . what s all that noise in the background? i m trying to hide.
upheld. what will congress do. what happens to the implementations at the state level. there are so many different branches on this tree. will we note future for this law regardless of what the supremes rule or will we be launched into another 6 months or two more years of vast national confusion. those are great questions. we all said we need finality. we are so glad we got to the court this session. we are hoping they will rule in our favor of course. i m sing and tired of sue i m sick and tired of suing the federal government. but i will continue to sue the epa and the federal government until we get a president like mitt romney who will correct things and let the states manage. bill: if you lose, what is your strategy? if we lose, that s why it s even more important to take back
collins. bill: the house of representatives getting ready for an unprecedented contempt vote against attorney general eric holder. the chairman of the house oversight committee darrell issa says he believes the justice department is lying to congress in operation fast & furious. we are trying to get to the truth when we were told a lie. this is about a coverup. we are seeking documents we know to exist that are in fact about brian terry s murder. who knew and why people were lying about it and get to the truth. that s all we want. bill: he said a lot of things sunday morning. good morning. fresh off her sunday morning battle with brit hume on fox
written, to arrest that person and eventually deport them out of the country. jamie: if it s reasonable to believe that the offense would be a deportable offense. there are some standards. it will be interesting to see how the court analyzes that part of it. bill: part of the law was stated the following way section 6 of the arizona law it authorizes state and local police officers to arrest immigrants without a warrant if the officer has, quote, and this is important now, probable cause to believe they have committed a crime that makes them deportable from the united states. that is one issue that has been debated back and forth as to whether or not police police officers would have the authority under probable cause to think that they have committed a crime. jamie: that is a subjective standard. bill: it could be, and this is part of the reason why it has gone up to the u.s. supreme court. shannon bream is inside the courtroom and we are scanning the wires right now to figure out wha