Participate in the meeting through Video Conference to the same extent as if they are physically present. Public comment will be available on each item on this agenda, sfgov. Org is streaming the number across the board. The opportunity to speak during Public Comment period is available via phone call by calling 4156550001. Meeting id 146 4585942 and press pound twice. When connected you will hear the meeting discussions, but you will be muted. Dial star 3 to be added to the speaker line. The best practice is to call from a quiet location, speak clearly and slowly and turn down your television or radio. Alternatively, you can email myself the budget appropriations clerk at linda. Wong sfgov. Org. To submit Public Comment via email it will be forwarded to the board of supervisors and be included as part of the official file. Items are expected to appear on july 21st, and spanish and chinese interpretation are available for those who need Translation Services during Public Comment period
First its always the hardest and when they look back they really wont see you, but its the path that youre paving forward for the next one behind you that counts. Hi, my name is jajaida durden and im the acting superintendent for the bureau of forestry and i work for public works operations. And im over the landscaping, the shop and also the arborist crew. And some tree inspectors as well. I have been with the city and county of San Francisco for 17 years. And i was a cement mason, that was my first job. When i got here i thought that it was too easy. So i said one day ill be a supervisor. And when i run this place it will be ran different. And i i didnt think that it wod happen as fast as it did, but it did. And i came in 2002 and became a supervisor in 2006. And six months later i became the permanent supervisor over the shop. With all of those responsibilities and the staff youre also dealing with different attitudes and you have to take off one hat and put on another hat and put on
Thank you, madam speaker. I ask unanimous consent to revise and extend my remarks. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Thank you, madam speaker. I yield to my friend from maryland, the majority leader. Mr. Hoyer i thank my friend from georgia for yielding. On monday the house will meet at 9 00 a. M. For morning hour debate, i repeat that because its unusual. On monday, 9 00 a. M. For morning hour debate and 10 00 a. M. For legislative business, votes expected to occur as early as 2 30 p. M. On tuesday and wednesday the house will meet at 9 00 a. M. For morning hour debate and 10 00 a. M. For legislative business. On thursday, the house will meet at 9 00 a. M. For legislative business. The house will consider h. R. 1425, Patient Protection and Affordable Care enhancement act. This bill will sig canly increase the a. C. A. s affordability, subsidies, lower Prescription Drug prices, expand coverage and crack down on junk plans. While strengthening protections for people with preexi
From now until ever, and i asked specifically, what about if a woman came in and had had one successful pregnancy through whatever means, and was now desiring pregnancy again for the same kind of circumstances of having had one pregnancy, would she be considered fertile or infertile . And given the circumstances would be considered infertile at that point, even though she had had because this is a new encounter. It is a new time. I think that this covers the situations that might arise that would be again, it is not a permanent diagnosis of infertility by any diagnostic criteria. It is a situational situational diagnosis. We would cover two episodes. But apparently not the third. But it would cover because we wouldnt know at the beginning it would be infertile. Whether it is the first pregnancy or the second. That is my understanding. I have assurances of that. And obviously if that is not the case, we would hear about that quickly and have to amend the policy as we needed to to make i
The diagnosis can be changed. So if someone does not need a permit diagnosis of infertility from now until ever, and i asked specifically, what about if a woman came in and had had one successful pregnancy through whatever means, and was now desiring pregnancy again for the same kind of circumstances of having had one pregnancy, would she be considered fertile or infertile . And given the circumstances would be considered infertile at that point, even though she had had because this is a new encounter. It is a new time. I think that this covers the situations that might arise that would be again, it is not a permanent diagnosis of infertility by any diagnostic criteria. It is a situational situational diagnosis. We would cover two episodes. But apparently not the third. But it would cover because we wouldnt know at the beginning it would be infertile. Whether it is the first pregnancy or the second. That is my understanding. I have assurances of that. And obviously if that is not the c