Who has resigned. And so if you are reappointmented what are some of the areas that you would like to be able to focus on in your work on the task force. Again, really the by laws to make our policy and practices a little more concrete, and so that we know that we have the procedures so that one complainant may know what their inaudible and making sure that we have a fair hearing. Also the calendar of officials and of course, the it issues are also big issues that we need to focus on. Thank you. And you mentioned equity in the terms of the processes of the task force, what would that look like . How would you envision bringing equity . So, one of the things that we are working on is the person does not show up for the hearing what do we do . Do we grant a continuance or do we just take the case and i allow for a continuance because they filed the complaint and they deserve to have it heard at some point, whether they could not make the date that they actually are schedule for. So, just
Continue, for one, we just, we just we did our by laws and i was ready for that and i think that we, are moving in a good direction in terms of having a more equitable for complaint ans and i think that we have a long way to go on that and i think that they are headed in the right direction and also, we are and we have, and we have it from the index of the records in june, and this, and this task force is been taking in that we had a presentation in our last meeting but in the record of the folks and we hope to have them back at a future meeting for an up date and also we have been working on the officials calendars which i know is a big issue that supervisor avalos supports. And so at this point, i will take any questions. Thank you. And thank you to your service. Actually started in october, so basically your term and you had a short term. I had a short term. I was filling the term of who has resigned. And so if you are reappointmented what are some of the areas that you would like t
As an exercise in Community Engagement and awareness building. You know one of the other things that was articulated in the letter from the bcdc they see stop consolidation as a way to speed up service or i cant remember reduce run times and i dont know thats necessarily the intent of the stop consolidation. From what i understand the intent is really make the system more efficient and to conserve resources so we can protect service that is threatened because of the current cost of operations, and im concerned that theres a lot of hype thats out there on the part of people that are understandably concerned about bus stops being removed but theyre exploiting the idea with the intent of stopping it, but not being all together fully informed of what the purpose of things like this are for and or other reasons, so i am concerned that a lot of folks dont understand title six. Youre right. Its very complicated, but im also very concerned about an organization like the bcdc which is a Pretty
Like the ft. Sutter run and the trolleys are still there and basically a violation of civil rights with the transit effectiveness project. It really is wrong headed. Its based on supply and demand. Its not based on moral principles and sufficient rights and that is fundamentally wrong and i think. Will be contested in the future, if not by me by someone else and it will come down hard on you and you will pay the consequences. Thank you very much. Anyone else care to speak . There is another slip over there. Is that the same one, same item . Oh okay. Thank you. We have heard from the public. Members of the board. Good presentation. Yeah good presentation. Thank you very much. I did have one question. I know we do the a letter from the bcdc asking that question about seniors and i understand in your presentation you said this is actually not the appropriate tool to address the question of seniors and people with disabilities and im sorry did you say which one is the correct tool and i mi
Trolleys are still there and basically a violation of civil rights with the transit effectiveness project. It really is wrong headed. Its based on supply and demand. Its not based on moral principles and sufficient rights and that is fundamentally wrong and i think. Will be contested in the future, if not by me by someone else and it will come down hard on you and you will pay the consequences. Thank you very much. Anyone else care to speak . There is another slip over there. Is that the same one, same item . Oh okay. Thank you. We have heard from the public. Members of the board. Good presentation. Yeah good presentation. Thank you very much. I did have one question. I know we do the a letter from the bcdc asking that question about seniors and i understand in your presentation you said this is actually not the appropriate tool to address the question of seniors and people with disabilities and im sorry did you say which one is the correct tool and i missed it . Or is that something w