Good morning everyone. And welcome to the tuesday, december 11th, 2012, meeting of the San Francisco county Transportation Authority. My name is david campos and i am the chair of the authority. The clerk is cheng and we want to thank the following members of sfgtv staff for covering the meeting. Madam clerk, could call roll call . Camposes . Present. Chiu. Present. Chu. Present. Cohen . Fer ill absent. Mar . Mar, present. Kim, absent. Olague. We are absolutely a quorum. And i did hear that commissioner cohen and commissioner weiner as well. If you could call item two. Approval of minutes of the november 20, 2012 this is an action item. Colleagues this is an action item, before we take action, i want to open it up to Public Comment, any people of the public who would like to speak on the minutes . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. If we could have the roll call. Avos. Aye. Chiu aye. Chu. Aye. Cohen. Elsbernd . Fer ill . Aye. Kim, absent. Mar, olague . Aye. Weiner . Aye. And item p
Lease inserted after the phrase to sign an affidavit. My eyes arent finding. Its in the boards draft conditions of findings. First sentence. Read the sentence in insert. Prior to purchase or lease. Where is that . To be inserted after the phrase, to sign an affidavit. Okay. Prior to purchase or lease. Okay. Thank you. Good evening, Steve Williams. Im confused about the scope of the hearing. To my understanding is the hearing is to comments on the findings. I submitted those on my letter. There is no hearing on the merits of the case. There is none of that is to occur at this hearing is my understanding. If there is a different reading of the rules, then i think i need to know that before i get started. The board voted and then closed that hearing, said no more briefing, no more exhibits. Now im confused when the City Attorney commented that it was on for another hearing. So. Its not another hearing. Its the same hearing. If its different, i need to know under what rule is that occurrin
Construction at 4 00 p. M. Monday through friday. Mr. Rut acres stated to miss brian that he believes the marsh is not active. This is probably why he addressed the Merchants Association over the holidays and asked them to write a letter in support of the 6 00 p. M. Stop of the construction work. By email of january 1st, wrote to miss wise man and said we have written the developer and let him know that we could not support his request. Even the exterior hours. Thats a 50hour workweek. University employees are going to be working longer than that. I forgot, the developer hasnt made a former commitment to hire union labor. In any case hes entitle to a 9hour workday and 50hour workweek. There is heavy bike traffic on valencia street. It requires buyers and renters to sign an affidavit and made aware of a theatre next door. We believe we have addressed the validity of this condition in our three page brief. We ask for the phrase to be inserted in the phrase. Thank you very much for your t
Lease inserted after the phrase to sign an affidavit. My eyes arent finding. Its in the boards draft conditions of findings. First sentence. Read the sentence in insert. Prior to purchase or lease. Where is that . To be inserted after the phrase, to sign an affidavit. Okay. Prior to purchase or lease. Okay. Thank you. Good evening, Steve Williams. Im confused about the scope of the hearing. To my understanding is the hearing is to comments on the findings. I submitted those on my letter. There is no hearing on the merits of the case. There is none of that is to occur at this hearing is my understanding. If there is a different reading of the rules, then i think i need to know that before i get started. The board voted and then closed that hearing, said no more briefing, no more exhibits. Now im confused when the City Attorney commented that it was on for another hearing. So. Its not another hearing. Its the same hearing. If its different, i need to know under what rule is that occurrin
Affidavit and made aware of a theatre next door. We believe we have addressed the validity of this condition in our three page brief. We ask for the phrase to be inserted in the phrase. Thank you very much for your time. Can you repeat that last suggested modification . Yes. Quote, prior to the purchase what letter . Condition h. Okay. , prior to purchase or lease inserted after the phrase to sign an affidavit. My eyes arent finding. Its in the boards draft conditions of findings. First sentence. Read the sentence in insert. Prior to purchase or lease. Where is that . To be inserted after the phrase, to sign an affidavit. Okay. Prior to purchase or lease. Okay. Thank you. Good evening, Steve Williams. Im confused about the scope of the hearing. To my understanding is the hearing is to comments on the findings. I submitted those on my letter. There is no hearing on the merits of the case. There is none of that is to occur at this hearing is my understanding. If there is a different read