Okay, there is no fine for this. Do they have to run the title . Please make sure to silence all cell phones on electronic devices. Replace speaker cards and any documents to be submitted to the clerk. [reading notes] item number 1, 180777, ordinane amending the planning code to require a conditional use authorization for employee cafeterias, as defined, within office space, except for existing employee cafeterias; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under planning code, section 302. We had to make some amendments i had to set for one week. Anything you would like to add about this legislation . Clerk just to reiterate that we were to considerable amount of time with all of the stakeholders in i feel like weve got most i think we are in good
Going to happen here and its a terrible thing. Im not under im not trying to diminish the importance, but the worst Case Scenario would be after all these hearings are over and the c. U. Is approved but a variance is denied, that the permit holder sometime, probably in the beginning of 2021, because thats how long its going to take, is going to have to cutoff 5 feet of the house and go back to go back to what the original program was. The Planning Commission would have the ability to make other modifications to the project. They could reduce the height of it, they could reduce the extension. Im hesitant to give that information to the appellant because the commission can and has in other cases, you know, had them go back to what was there before. In this case, i think what at least weighs in their favor is what was there before was a legal noncomplying structure. It has a garage at the front i mean, generally planning principles would be to have something towards the front of the prope
Financially members can go to the clinic and only pay the copay and not have to worry about being reimbursed later on. Thank you. Say a member loses sir her prescription for medication, is this already coverage, is it included,. Under that scenario, they would call kaiser and we would coordinate getting them a prescription. They would not have to pay out of pocket and get reimbursed to that case. The contract is only for prescriptions related to that visit. They can still absolutely get coverage. So if they went in with a urinary tract action is by the way, amount of my prevention, they could get the acute care, were they couldnt get the prevention care that they run out of . They could get it, but they could get it out of pocket for that specific drug. We have just started this contract and i dont know how that will evolve in the future, but terrific for people travelling and those in College Students in other states, as well. I have one other update, we launched, as of yesterday, a s
Our clerk is erica major who is delighted she will not see us for the next month. Do you have any announcements. I guess sf gov tv has to run the title. Okay, there is no fine for this. Do they have to run the title . Please make sure to silence all cell phones on electronic devices. Replace speaker cards and any documents to be submitted to the clerk. [reading notes] item number 1, 180777, ordinane amending the planning code to require a conditional use authorization for employee cafeterias, as defined, within office space, except for existing employee cafeterias; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under planning code, section 302. We had to make some amendments i had to set for one week. Anything you would like to add about this legislatio
[reading notes] item number 1, 180777, ordinane amending the planning code to require a conditional use authorization for employee cafeterias, as defined, within office space, except for existing employee cafeterias; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under planning code, section 302. We had to make some amendments i had to set for one week. Anything you would like to add about this legislation . Clerk just to reiterate that we were to considerable amount of time with all of the stakeholders in i feel like weve got most i think we are in good shape. It is an honor to be your cosponsor. Does mr. Sanchez, nothing from planning, is there any Public Comments on item number one . Seeing none. Public comment is closed. If there is no objections, w