Chairman Julius Genachowski and former fcc commissioner robert mcdowell. Thats followed by our discussion with congressman greg walden, chairman of the house subcommittee on communications and technology. Guest were in a landscape thats absolutely shifting, and there are areas of the statutory scheme where it would make sense to look at and say are those keeping up with the changes in the marketplace. Fundamentally, having this kind of competition, programming innovation, access by new players to consumers and access by the traditional players to viewers in new ways. Obviously, whats happening on tablets is amazing. Whats starting to happen in the living room is very exciting. Were in just an incredible time when it comes to the delivery of video programming to consumers. There are issues. We heard it at the commission, both of us did, from distributers who were concerned about the costs of programming. Consumers are concerned about the costs of programming, so thats an issue of i thin
Keeping the healthy hetch hetchy that means well have to be back before you and the Mayors Office and other policymakers every year asking for general fund rates to have the ability to have more fully paying customers or have more power Revenue Bonds or have to revisit which we do every year the problematic cuts or deferrals real quick it strikes me were going to have a discussion around cca and the big deficit is because of house senate and the mountain you tunnel can you talk about that what that means deferring capital theres a reflex whats the risk level, you know, obviously theres been a policy decision id rather fund that rather than that people can draw conclusions here and theres a couple of i think straightforward for example, one the mountain tunnel an assessment was done we have more information as well as the reinforcement and the realigning in the that tunnel by sector this over a 10 or 12 mile distances that needs to be you upgraded and go around and mitigate the risks ev
2016 and the recommend the reductions are ongoing savings and 55 thousand plus a onetime savings those allow an increase of 6. 5 percent of one time savings excuse me. This allows an increase in the departments fiscal year 2015 2016 as i stated we have significant differences but well report back next week thank you, mr. Rose back to the puc. So cc aside mooibdz theres still disagreement with mr. Roses suggestions yes. We in. Fairness we owe them Additional Information were in the middle of providing that and some will be transmitted over the next couple of days. Were not going to have a complete picture obviously were going to talk about the calendar items later today but we dont have a complete picture of the puc today; is that correct. You have a complete picture of the proposed budget i think in fairness f to the budget analyst you have to see were there might be room for Additional Savings we owe them information and to mr. Roses point and supervisor avalos point the list of items
There will under the pucs request to issue and sell 100113. For hetch hetchy bond and my understanding is that mr. Chair that specific appropriation and the sale of the issuance of the bonds will be considered by your committee next wednesday thats my understanding ill report on that subject including the deappropriation will be issued to the board of supervisors tomorrow i want the board to know its not included in this specific budget. So for Committee Members were going to continue the supplemental to next weeks meeting so an budget Analyst Report then. Supervisor farrell on item 10 is mentioned the appropriation for the clean power sf thats before us today. Yes. My understanding. Just our analysis. My understanding is supervisor avalos because of the issuance of the bond were not on the calendar that the clerk stated that the items could not be considered until you have the issuance as well as the appropriation thats why we didnt reporting report on it today. Thats correct. Members
Our recommended reduction is for the total of reduction in 2015 2016 and the recommend the reductions are ongoing savings and 55 thousand plus a onetime savings those allow an increase of 6. 5 percent of one time savings excuse me. This allows an increase in the departments fiscal year 2015 2016 as i stated we have significant differences but well report back next week thank you, mr. Rose back to the puc. So cc aside mooibdz theres still disagreement with mr. Roses suggestions yes. We in. Fairness we owe them Additional Information were in the middle of providing that and some will be transmitted over the next couple of days. Were not going to have a complete picture obviously were going to talk about the calendar items later today but we dont have a complete picture of the puc today; is that correct. You have a complete picture of the proposed budget i think in fairness f to the budget analyst you have to see were there might be room for Additional Savings we owe them information and