Meeting of the local Agency Formation commission. My name is david campos and i am the chair of the commission. We are joined by the clerk linda wong and i want to thank the San Francisco gtv staff for the coverage of this meeting. Madam clerk, if you can please call item number two, roll call. Supervisor avalos, absent. Supervisor olague. Here. Supervisor im sorry, commissioner schmeltzer. Here. Commissioner mar. Commissioner pimentel absent. Chairperson campos. Present. Mr. Chair, there is a quorum. Item two approval from the minutes from the regular meeting and november 30 joint meeting with the san frcisco Public Utilities commission. Great. Before we take action on this item i would like to open it up for Public Comment. If there is any member of the public that would like to speak on item number two please come forward. Seeing none Public Comment is closed. Colleagues this is an action item. Can we have a motion to approve the minutes . We have a motion for commissioner schmeltze
With the San Francisco Public Utilities commission. Great. Before we take action on this item i would like to open it up for Public Comment. If there is any member of the public that would like to speak on item number two please come forward. Seeing none Public Comment is closed. Colleagues this is an action item. Can we have a motion to approve the minutes . We have a motion for commissioner schmeltzer. Second by commissioner olague. If we can take that without objection. Madam clerk you can call item three. Item three is review of the Renewable Energy task force. We will have fried. Im going to turn it over to danielle and give a presentation of the report and we are available for questions after that. Great. Thank you. Thanks jason. I will return through this fairly quickly, especially the background which you are all familiar with, but if you questions please stop me. Awz know San Francisco has a long history of Climate Action and a lot of the work that we have done over the last c
Meeting of the local Agency Formation commission. My name is david campos and i am the chair of the commission. We are joined by the clerk linda wong and i want to thank the San Francisco gtv staff for the coverage of this meeting. Madam clerk, if you can please call item number two, roll call. Supervisor avalos, absent. Supervisor olague. Here. Supervisor im sorry, commissioner schmeltzer. Here. Commissioner mar. Commissioner pimentel absent. Chairperson campos. Present. Mr. Chair, there is a quorum. Item two approval from the minutes from the regular meeting and november 30 joint meeting with the San Francisco Public Utilities commission. Great. Before we take action on this item i would like to open it up for Public Comment. If there is any member of the public that would like to speak on item number two please come forward. Seeing none Public Comment is closed. Colleagues this is an action item. Can we have a motion to approve the minutes . We have a motion for commissioner schmelt
So, commercial customers pay only what commercial customers should be paying and residential customers pay only what residential customers should be paying because of the costs are divvied up. This model assumes that all the cost savings are socialized and that those cost savings which are predominantly generated by commercial customers are shared with residential customers. So, its not a good or bad policy, but its just a very different policy than what we get than in the past. So, one of the questions that we have posed to the contractors and also to others who have been involved in the Stakeholder Group is its a very large assumption to assume that private property commercial owners would be willing to or would want to share their savings with residential customers because they could do many of the good things that are being proposed for Energy Efficiency and capture 100 of the savings for themselves or for their tenants. So, absent that, the model is hard to make the numbers work.
That those cost savings which are predominantly generated by commercial customers are shared with residential customers. So, its not a good or bad policy, but its just a very different policy than what we get than in the past. So, one of the questions that we have posed to the contractors and also to others who have been involved in the Stakeholder Group is its a very large assumption to assume that private property commercial owners would be willing to or would want to share their savings with residential customers because they could do many of the good things that are being proposed for Energy Efficiency and capture 100 of the savings for themselves or for their tenants. So, absent that, the model is hard to make the numbers work. And, so, one other assumption, too, i thought i saw in there was the exhetch hetchy power would be used. Are we able to do that . I thought that would be able to be used for residential. At the appropriate time, yes, please answer the question. So, we have