president. this is tonight. here it is. president trump continues to make the same false claims about a stolen election with which he has misled millions of americans. these interest same claims he knows provoked violence in the past. any communications mr. trump has with this committee will be under oath. and if he persists in lying then, he will be accountable under the laws of this great nation and subject to criminal penalties for every false word he speaks. okay. mr. attorney, what do you think she is getting at with that? i am so glad you used that second clip there, that under oath one. what she says immediately before that is that the president is offering to debate members of this committee. and she says that is nonsense. this is not some serious playground taunts thing. this is a standing committee of congress. and if you wish to have words with any of us, you can come in
signalled it may pursue a criminal contempt report against jeffrey clark if he stone walls their investigation any further. he is a justice official who promoted trump s false claims. he will submit to questions on saturday but intends to invoke the 5th amendment against self-incrimination. liz cheney warned no one is above the law including the former president. have a listen. any communications mr. trump has with this committee will be under oath, and if he persists in lying then, he will be accountable under the laws of this great nation and subject to criminal penalties for every false word he speaks. trump s former chief of staff mark meadows is scheduled to appear before the committee next week. he tells a right-wing broadcaster here in the uk they will honor trump s claims of executive privilege and only discuss nonprivileged information. he already had given the
he wants to debate members of this committee. this committee s investigation into the violent assault on our capitol on january 6th is not a game. when this committee convenes hearings, witnesses will be called to testify under oath. any communications mr. trump has with this committee will be under oath. and if he persists in lying then, he will be accountable under the laws of this great nation and subject to criminal penalties for every false word he speaks. thank you, mr. chairman. i yield back. young lady yields back. pursuant to notice, i now call up the report on a resolution recommending that the house of representatives find jeffrey boesert clark in contempt of congress for refusal to comply with a subpoena dually issued by the select committee to
this committee. this committee s investigation into the violent assault on our capitol on january 6th is not a game. any communications mr. trump has with this committee will be under oath. and if he persists in lying then, he will be accountable under the laws of this great nation and subject to criminal penalties for every false word he speaks. she is not messing around. those efforts to hold the disgraced expresident and his team accountable for the january 6th insurrection is where we start today with some of our favorite reporters and friends. luke broad butter is back, new york times congressional reporter, also msnbc contributor and former congress woman cona edwards is here. and harry litman former u.s. attorney joins us. harry, let me start with you on what jeffrey clark is doing.
lets a play one more sound byte from liz cheney. the vice chair of the january 6th committee. he recently suggested he wants to debate members of this committee. this committee s investigation into the violent assault on our capitol on january 6th is not a game. when this committee convenes hearings, witnesses will be called to testify under oath. any communications mr. trump has with this committee will be underoath. and if he persists in lying then, he will be accountable already the laws of this great nation and subject to criminal penalties for every false word he speaks. what is it with these trump people and this fake bravado gamsmanship? what do you as a prosecutor, that seems to me in itself to be contempt use of this process. it is. and there is an easy way for prosecutors to address that bravado. if the evidence supports