A group of legal and privacy analysts gave differing views on how the roles would affect consumers and businesses at a forum on capitol hill hosted by the congressional internet caucus committee. This is just over an hour. All right, folks. Welcome to another Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee briefing. Thanks, everyone, for coming to this recess briefing. Were going to try to do this really quickly in like one hour and explain this issue from a pro and con perspective. The briefing that youve walked into, in case youre in the wrong place, is the new fcc privacy rules for broadband providers. What will they mean for privacy . And this is hosted by the Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee in conjunction with the congressional internet caucus itself, which is chaired on the house side by congressman Bob Goodlatte and congress wam eshoo and on the senate side by senator john thune and senator patrick leahy. We are super supportive, appreciative of their support a
Really quickly in like one hour and explain this issue from a pro and con perspective. The briefing that youve walked into, in case youre in the wrong place, is the new fcc privacy rules for broadband providers. What will they mean for privacy . And this is hosted by the Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee in conjunction with the congressional internet caucus itself, which is chaired on the house side by congressman Bob Goodlatte and congress wam eshoo and on the senate side by senator john thune and senator patrick leahy. We are super supportive, appreciative of their support and the fact they allow us to host these briefings in conjunction with them in a fair and balanced way. And their ability to say we dont care where our particular perspectives are but we just want to actually have a good debate, pros and cons on these issues, and let, you know, Congressional Staff decide where they come out on the issue. So before i get going, just a few little bits of housekeeping.
Cyber security and heightened security. Our phone lines are open. We are happy to your thoughts on this topic. The numbers are on the screen. You can also catch up with us on social media. A very good thursday morning to you. We begin today with a headline about a 40 planned assault on the United States capitol, this from the Washington Times this morning. An ohio man planted slotted into a tactic capital, saying he wanted to work with islamic state. The fbi and Homeland Security issued a memo notifying lot basement Law Enforcement agencies across the nation about the memo. That story coming during the week british Prime Minister David Cameron is expected at the white house, and in which he is suggesting banning some online messaging apps. Snack chat and whatsapp are in the crosshairs in britain, according snapped chat and whatsapp are in the crosshairs in britain, according to the article. British Prime Minister David Cameron spoke about this yesterday when he was questioned during Pr
Other major languages that is also done by other City Departments in the draft proposal we disagree and will not do this it is an unwanted search and been determined the demands for such services is zero pressor i find that had a right to building in the city of San Francisco where every other City Department were told provides those information were saying in terms of what were doing what were doing is insignificant and people speaking other languages dont connect about it we should provide the information in those languages. I would change our recommendation that the Ethics Commission shall make the materials available in other languages as in other City Departments. Other commissions from the commissioners. I did have questions as well. Recommendation 7 in particular what the form is that the demand is zero . Theres 3 different approaches that each agency can use that the city requires looking at whether there have been requests for bilingual languages is one of them im sorry i cant
As possible so on outside lobbyist you make one contact with a city official you have to automatically registration as a lobbyist then the issue thats known as obligates that is directed towards the public saying hey please contact our Public Officials to do xyz. That gets to the expertise lobbyist that was addressed its true we dont have a regime for that right now. So whether its thats called for or not if the grand jury thinks to some stent it is that makes sense any other comments from the commissioners on finding recommendation 10 . Finding and recommendation 11 . I also want some clarification on 11. I dont know if the City Attorney actually should talk about the upcoming case id like to know why we think its maybe you want to change that sewer Deputy Director arnold i believe what the staff is proposing in terms of recommendation 11 in the reference for an upcoming superior Court Case Involving the city and the bay whether emails sent concerning city business on the officials pr