the congress as well as anyone that calls themselves a leader in this country. what are we doing? eli, some criticisms that the white house staff seems immune to. this branding the entire trump administration as a group of liars seems like one that might get under their skin. yeah, i think so. but everybody in that administration, at least the people we deal with in the communication shop, they dismiss they don t like that word lies but they say the president, when you ask them in those briefings and say does the president really believe something that s demonstrably false, that s what the president believes. the white house only exists in service to this president and his beliefs and his reality is his reality. there s no changing it. so he s not going to be shamed by any incoherence or demonstrable untruth. he just won t be. and the impact is there s this numbing effect. we re living that as a country day after day after day. going back to the campaign, it s hard to process all
administration? because that s talking about we re going to help race relations in this country, increase economic status and i ve gone jason as a long time. that s what you do when you don t have an actual answer on credibility. so you find something positive and you spin it. and that s what would happen if there were real communication shop there, not who doesn t know what she s doing either. what political background she won a race. i think there should be more that s his answer right there. i think it s indicative for the republican party, and quite frankly, i think you can say for all of politics in general.
the trump campaign or anythibod else that would tell them where to target the ads. there s some benefit to your point to getting inside the respective parts dna. the communication shop. and to figure out what the problems are for the party. the dnc break in is significant because it s land mine of opportunity. this is fake news but they almost camouflage inside someone a republican or democrat might already be saying or putting out there. it s sort of like fake activism is a good way of putting it. we ll hit the pause button here. thank you very much. up next, a republican retirement that has democrats getting excited. i ll explain.
the president did give an interview to the new york times where he said he didn t want to energize the movement. he hasn t repeated that statement in recent times. that is what many folks what to hear the president do. one statement came from an unnamed white house official. why was it attached to a chief of staff or press secretary or the president himself? that is another question that we don t yet have an answer to. the statement would have more force and someone in the communication shop or the president himself. so it is odd to see them take
the reasons david just described. they have followed up on this within the communication shop. mark lauder, the vice president s press secretary was on fox this morning. i believe he ll be on erin burnett tonight, i was listening to cove servicety roof coming in, and he head he has done several others. this is an offense to do defense on the concept of him and certainly is not i don t think everybody is on board, it probably would have sufficed to raising money about the pac, it s about the vice president going out and helping members of congress getting reelected, and not about me. so the vice president gave it legs. i think the president also gave it legs, in the sense he tweeted