Welcome to our tuesday, july 21, 2015 of the tangs meeting im katie tang we have supervisor christensen supervisor breed and supervisor farrell here today, i want to thank sfgovtv jason and others steve. Roll call supervisor breed supervisor christensen supervisor farrell supervisor tang supervisor wiener kwhoopz supervisor yee we have quorum. Thank you. Well move on to item 2. Citizens Advisory Committee an information item. We have chris our cca chair wanted to report on a few items on the agenda item 4 the question is the cac question whether the sales of the airport would close the funds during Public Comment it was brought up the current the current routes conflict with the code regarding the future railroad connections to the east bay those are the two items that came up this item passed item 7 the geary brt as often the case we on cac have questions on the corridor to which the cac staff addressed the concerns concerns as and do and the section of the item the cac question judge
Call the one way couplet that used the hollywood area to get the bus Service Cross 101 and the southern option that routes the bus through the bayview area for the buffer to the south we are working with ecology throughout the study to identify the timeline for the bayview option well talk about in the latter part of the presentation. For the one paw cup lightwell weve landmarked two all of the elements looking at keeping parking on both sides but enabling the bus service by reducing the sidewalk width and having the ground utilities the other option to remove the parking only one side and keep the sidewalks the same as current are right now in terms of understanding the impact parking would be reduced approximately from 1. 8 on Street Parking to 4. 5 the study team looked at the mitigation measures for not impacting parking too much so we heard concerns from the community and shared the benefits of the different all of the elements and basically we saw anymore reliable transit for the
They responsive to your and fyi if you sell a product which includes a cd or tape unfortunately, were so digital that is not the way people sell their product but a product you made you could currently right now go into the street Artist Program and get one of the stalls in a variety of locations for a period of time that is already something we can and will you know send people to if they come in with that but if they dont have something to sell they dont qualify if you want to put a hat out you cant in order to change that it requires a vote of the people of San Francisco theyre considering this is a very old 1972 piece of legislation you might have voted for it to create the street Artist Program maybe not you but it needs to go back to the voters that is not out of the question at all for the Arts Commission but were talking a few years. So someone puts out a hat thats the major modification. Based on the requirement for the street 56r9s program do you said. You have to you canned
Would like to comment, and seeing none come forward, well close Public Comment and also announce the arrival of commissioner lindo. Welcome. Thank you. And if we have a motion on the minutes. So moved. A motion from commissioner crews, seconded by commissioner mar, and well take that without objection. Okay. Item no. 3, please. Item 3 is Community Choice aggregation activities report, a, the status update on cleanpowersf program and timeline for program launch, b, status update on the proceedings at the California Public Utilities Commission and c, status update on state legislation and d, the civil grand jury report entitled cleanpowersf at long last. Thank you, we dont have barbara hale, but we have michael here to present on our cca activities are going in San Francisco and i know they are Going Forward in a way that well be very happy about. Look forward to the report. Thank you, good afternoon, commissioners. Happy friday. Michael heims, San Francisco. So i think what im going to
Is another meeting next week and so well keep you posted to what is being developed. As to what is being developed in relationship to that. Also, we did ask the Business Group to think about you know, the upcoming years and what are key topics of things for this group to work with the mayor on. So, some of the topics that came up again were just dealing with congestion, multiagency communication still is somewhat a issue and also for the sit a to work with the private entities to be more responsive around their congestion and work and notification. Homelessness has been brought up a couple times and think may be a ongoing topic for especially for the city to report back on. Departments improving their response and turn around time for Small Businesses. So, those are some of thethis the Business Community exspessed wanting to focus on for the future. And then last week supervisor tang in response to the controllers report on restaurant permitting process helds a hearing to highlight wha