Supervisor supervisor peskin. Present. Supervisor preston. Present. Supervisor ronen. Present. Supervisor safai. Supervisor self neil. Why present. Why supervisor walton. Present. You have a quorum. Thank you, in dam clerk the San Francisco board of supervisors acknowledges we are on the unseed ancestral home land of the recommend ram the original inhabitants of the San Francisco peninsula. As stursd of this land and with their traditions the Ramaytush Ohlone have never cd, lost nor forgot their responsibilities as care take exerts all people his reside in their traditional territory. We rescue noise we benefit from living and working on their Traditional Home land. We wish to pay respects acknowledgingan cest sxors relatives of the recommend Ram Community and rights as first peoples. Join mow in the pledge. [pledge of allegiance] in dam clerk do we have communications yes. The board away the public to attends this mote nothing person. Here in the board legislative chamber in city hall
Larger entities are coming in to take advantage of that land use space because its a fairly premium commodity, so the portable permits will allow the owner to be able to transport that permit to another location. There, of course, are a whole set of criteria to ensure that it isnt a new owneroperator during that process, and they have 18 months to find a new location. Also, consumption, so the definition of consumption was changed, so now, consumption does mean smoking and edible consuming or other ways of consuming drinking and will allow the retailers the ability to add that on. There are going to be specific criteria. Right now its being proposed as you have to have a separate consumption room, so again, this is going to be, you know, a bit of a challenge because there are some mcds that are small, and if when they transfer into a Cannabis Retailer, they wont have the room to create that space, so itll be interesting to see what the director comes with in terms of how the portable p
Have ever seen. I think it was, we dont want to put in first of all, theyre confidential. We dont want to put in anything that would restrict participation in or reporting of information but i have never understood so closed does not speak to the merits of the number of complaints received. Im wondering if theres a reason and i think there is, but if you could tell me again, i would appreciate it. You are correct. Because the complaint is closed doesnt mean it was substantiated. We evaluate the complaint, the investigation determines if theres a factual basis for the allegations and then if the allegations are true, if the alleged conduct would violate city criteria, policy and procedure or city code does that answer the first part . Substantiated or unsubstantiated are both inside the closed category. And in the quarterly and annual reports it breaks down it breaks out by department. Theres a table in quarterly reports or chart showing which percentage of complaints closed led to Depa
You can also measure a complaint that had merit found in wrong doing that was stopped. Thats another way to measure it. And thats never reflected in the analysis of the material i have ever seen. I think it was, we dont want to put in first of all, theyre confidential. We dont want to put in anything that would restrict participation in or reporting of information but i have never understood so closed does not speak to the merits of the number of complaints received. Im wondering if theres a reason and i think there is, but if you could tell me again, i would appreciate it. You are correct. Because the complaint is closed doesnt mean it was substantiated. We evaluate the complaint, the investigation determines if theres a factual basis for the allegations and then if the allegations are true, if the alleged conduct would violate city criteria, policy and procedure or city code does that answer the first part . Substantiated or unsubstantiated are both inside the closed category. And in
That would restrict participation in or reporting of information but i have never understood so closed does not speak to the merits of the number of complaints received. Im wondering if theres a reason and i think there is, but if you could tell me again, i would appreciate it. You are correct. Because the complaint is closed doesnt mean it was substantiated. We evaluate the complaint, the investigation determines if theres a factual basis for the allegations and then if the allegations are true, if the alleged conduct would violate city criteria, policy and procedure or city code does that answer the first part . Substantiated or unsubstantiated are both inside the closed category. And in the quarterly and annual reports it breaks down it breaks out by department. Theres a table in quarterly reports or chart showing which percentage of complaints closed led to Department Taking corrective or preventive action. Or even it shows whether or not the department moves on the recommendation