The White House Press secretary also criticized New York Times and Anonymous Sources on the story. Hello, everyone. The front page of the new york the venue for discussing classified information. The white house podium is not the venue. We are here today, having this discussion because of this irresponsible, anonymous leak to the New York Times. There is no good scenario as a result of this report. Who is going to want to be a source or an asset if they know their identity could be disclosed . Which allies will want to share information with us, if they know that some rogue Intelligence Officer can flash that information on the front page of a major newspaper, specifically, there are two bad scenarios that emerge from this report. It makes it more difficult to come to a consensus on this matter to verify intelligence and this level of controversy and discord lays directly into the hands of russia. Since before President Trump assumed office, damaging and often times erroneous leaks see
Hello, everyone. The first page of the New York Times is not the venue for discussing classified information. The white house podium is not the venue for discussing classified information. We are here today having this discussion because of an irresponsible, anonymous leaks to the New York Times. There is no good scenario as a result of this New York Times report. Who is going to want to cooperate with the United States Intelligence Committee . Was going to want to be a source or asset if they know that their identity could be disclosed . Which allies will want to share information with us if they know that some rogue Intelligence Officer can give that information on the front page of a major u. S. Newspaper . Specifically, there are two bad scenarios that emerge from this report. Number one, this report makes it more difficult to come to a consensus on this matter to verify intelligence. And number two, this level of controversy and discord play directly into the hands of russia, and
Daytoday, awaiting the headline gdp number for the Second Quarter, but looking to scrutinize domestic activity numbers, fixed Asset Investment, Industrial Production, retail sales, all expected to show stability and she lower. Given it is a key Political Year for beijing, we are looking at stability as the theme when it comes to growth. Take a look at this chart that paints a picture of the boring trajectory when it comes to that headline gdp number over the past two years. We have been hovering around that 7 level. We really do want to look closely at the breakdown of the Growth Numbers are going to be. It the Property Markets slow down continuing to bode ill for the growth in the second half of the year. Have we come off the peak in terms of input prices. We will take a look at the deleveraging drive and how that is affecting growth. We are 30 minutes away from the open in hong kong and china. Singapore and malaysia coming online. We saw that interesting session in the u. S. Where al
That well, there was this other Campaign Committee that was under the coordination of supervisor farrells Campaign Share and they were doing a number of things including giving him direct contributions but they were those other things they were just doing hit pieces on the opponent therefore thats not a Campaign Contribution the fact that group was doing hit pieces on the opponent that full 200000 for that committee controlled by supervisor farrells people during the time of the campaign was gave me in all the secret activities that pisses on the opponent and expenditures on his behalf it is 2 hundred thoughts u thousands of illegal money for his campaign this is a Campaign Contribution. Any motion by anyone . I dont have is a motion. Okay. Mr. Chairman i want to make a comment before a motion or any Public Comment i do know i want to remind administrative review at commissioners of the discuss it seems there protect no way to have it would be an allornone proposition by which internal
Happened here was that supervisor farrell in his 2010 campaign took an Illegal Campaign contribution of almost 200,000 thats what happened then in terms of it being the mechanism in which it was done, it was done through a committee another another committee that was cooperated by his own Campaign Chair that was running his campaign so it is as syrup as that a 200000 Illegal Campaign contribution that contemporarily took in 2010 question hesitate become in turn of the attachment we have to the agenda tonight t is who the statute of limitations has run on that matter and first mandates to the statute of limitations question i would point out to everyone here that illegal matter that a court will decide a judge will decide that a couple of our members are not its third reading im an attorney been one more 50 years deans of a law school i teach and practice law for a practitioner for thirty years i look at the letter that was put in by mr. Bell relating to who the statute of limitations h