[meeting adjourned] just a little pack of pad located at the bottom of russian hill, the secret garden with an intimate and captivating appeal. Carefully tucked away, at the bottom of lumbar street, the park makes the top of our list for the most intimate picnic setting. Avoid all tourist cars by hopping on the cable car. Or the 30, 45, 41 or 91 bus. This is the place to tell someone Something Special or the place to declare to friends and family the commitment you two share. Reservations are available with rec and park for this adorable good afternoon everybody and welcome to the San Francisco board of supervisors meeting for tuesday, july 12. 2016. Mdm. Clerk please call the roll. Supervisor avalos be present breed, present. Campos, present. Cohen, present. Farrell, present. Kim, present. Mar not present peskin, present. Tang, present. Weiner, present. Yee, present. You have a quorum thank you. Ladies and gentlemen please join us for the pledge of allegiance. [pleage of allegiance] t
Complaints, is that correct . And real estate. Somebody said real estate. Okay. No. The original proposal, if i may madame president , had both the office of labor standards and enforcement nocc under the public advocate, the amendment made in committee was actually with respect to both offices not have them been under public advocate, but to have the public advocate appoint the heads so the officers, were not moved under public advocate, actually, the public advocate had the ability to appoint. So that was different. But you didnt pull them out, you just changed it . I dont understand the question. For some reason, i was under the impression for example, office of citizens, complaints, was removed from public advocate in committee, and now placed back in but in a different form. What happened in committee is the way the olsc and the occ were left after i amended. After the committee made the other amendments, is those 2 offices were not under public advocate, they remained where they
Complaints, is that correct . And real estate. Somebody said real estate. Okay. No. The original proposal, if i may madame president , had both the office of labor standards and enforcement nocc under the public advocate, the amendment made in committee was actually with respect to both offices not have them been under public advocate, but to have the public advocate appoint the heads so the officers, were not moved under public advocate, actually, the public advocate had the ability to appoint. So that was different. But you didnt pull them out, u just changed it . I dont understand the question. For some reason, i was under the impression for example, office of citizens, complaints, was removed from public advocate in committee, and now placed back in but in a different form. What happened in committee is the way the olsc and the occ were left after i amended. After the committee made the other amendments, is those 2 offices were not under public advocate, they remained where they we
Numbers, people are out there in San Francisco six, in pain and dying. I am a senior. Im 73 years old this year. I live in San Francisco over 50 years. Longer than some of your ages. Ive lived all over in every district and this is now the 10th year that ive had to endure this terrific housing crisis could 10 years. First i was convicted in 2006 from my home, my rentcontrolled home of 21 years. I was so distraught i developed cancer in the middle of this move and i almost given up on finding anything affordable after year of looking. Im a local way. Ive written for some of the major magazines and newspapers here. That Small Businesses in this town. I currently now, because my age im on Social Security of 618 a month. I would like to know which one of you people here could live on that anywhere. Not even in detroit. I have 10 pages worth. How much longer can i do . Ive taken housemates to make the rent because now i am beingim getting evicted by the market rate increase. By landlord has
[gavel] we are back from recess. Seeing other names on the roster a chance to review the amendment i just want to say a couple things. I think the whole point forward trying to publish youras you get this language out of the charter and in the hands of the board. I think this is adding another layer that are not comfortable adding. I think we could accomplish what were trying to accomplish by doing it separately from this Charter Amendment and separately from this process. Im definitely committed to that and looking at grandfathering, and looking at feasibility and the kinds of things that are important to make sure that we put the appropriate number forward looking for. With that, colleagues, unfortunately im not comfortable supporting the change in this capacity but i am comfortable with alternative legislation that is language of the statement included in it in the future. With that madam clerk seeing other names on the roster please call the roll on the amendment supervisor tang ay