Multiunit fires where we come in and go with the fire department, with our partner and we worked with the family to get them housed and get them income and get them replacement and replacement for the clothes and restabilize and we look forward to building the partnerships and thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak. Thank you, i guess that we can say that you are new for two more months, the first year. The honeymoon period. And welcome to our disaster council. This comes to the point in the program where we are not at a roundtable, but it is the roundtable discussion, so is there or are there any updates, comments, and i know that michael, you have had something and michael . Greetings everyone, on wednesday, of this coming week we are going to be working with our partners and the San Francisco inner faith are going to work with the partners from the Emergency Management and the american cross bay area chapter and the agencies responding to disaster and Human Services agency
Of it. We have had the Supreme Court rulings, but the federal Election Commission has issued regulations that basically have narrowed disclosure to a level that is almost absurdly impossible to meet. People giving money specifically for an advertisement. I know that you see it as a vote best the federal Election Commission. Youre a very litigious guy. And repeated instances you have and judges have rebuffed those regulations. But in this particular case the District Court judges so and then the panel of the d. C. Circuit sent it back. Did you talk for just a couple of minutes about the destruction of the federal Election Commission and its role in the problems that we had but also the state of play in that particular and let me start with the latter. You are right best, we essentially won the case at the District Court level. On appeal the court actually found against us in part but then sent the case back to the federal District Court level to look at the other piece of the case. In f
Disapproval the site is right and dpw acted correctly i ask the board to uphold that decision for if this board will let at t to follow the correct s m f order next speaker good evening, everybody im curious stone the executive director of San Francisco beautiful i want to thank the president and staff and public for their times and thank you for your efforts to protect the cities right to dedicate time place and manner of those facilities. San francisco beautiful is interested in protecting San Francisco spaces and we sued San Francisco and at t seeking Environmental Review opposing the category california exception for this reason in specific youll all seen hundreds of protests and doris of appeals. We look forward to hearing the result of the state court on the decision of for our appeal but we look forward to working with at t and the department of public works and the board of supervisors to find a solution to make that process workable. And to hopefully, well have the opportunity
Tenant ill show you here. Indicates that the proposed sales price of the various price is unit one 750,000 and my clients 8 how thousands and going up. Whats inaccurate is not that the prices are wrong those units are not being offered for sale not the prices for the unit for sale unit 5 is not for sale the owner perhaps bought this unit for 425,000 years ago but those units are stated as being offered at those prices so my it is not necessary sees this is 450,000 higher in price its interesting to note he is a disabled senior and his unit is priced 450,000 more. Its this obligation to review the condominium conversion to assure consistency with the general plan and it affords a affirmative action but affirmative action is a disserve because the notice it dispersuades a potential purchaseer of thinking about buying a unit when he sees his unit is being price for 450,000 more its inaccurate for the notice that the tenant should alert the commission that the general plan is being thats r
It seems like those are units that were tics and now theyre going into condominium conversion theyll allowed to do i dont understand those units that the or in occupyers own their owners and occupyers i dont understand why there are prices on their unit as far as i bd from the documentation it the department received from the department of public works those are rejecting purchase from a committed conversion i think thats the distribution in which the paperwork is prepared beyond that i have to refer to the department of public works the definition specialities. Thank you. Yeah, i depends upon the process and i guess the units that are presently occupied by represents are allowed to stay if at the point too so those are are not for sale so the asking price doesnt have bearing unless the renter is interesting in buying their own unit. Right. So i dont understand the objection if the attorney for the fellow whos in number 4 i think. 3. 3. Okay. Thank you. Can i ask the young lady that i