That it is i understand that if good for one it should be good for all, but also think that this commission in its early days had a discussion about not putting undo stress on applicants for permits and that is why we grant conditionally and we dont make them come back after all of their signoff and stuff like that. And so, although, i see your point, and in most cases i would agree with you in this particular case, i do not. On my time during the commission, i know that we have added a condition that says that we approve, and allowed our staff to make that judgment whether they felt like the neighborhood out reach has been sufficient. So we can approve it with that amend that motion, though, and so i dont know if that is something that you feel like could work. One of the things that i am going to say about that is that it is okay to generally approve that, but as we get more into the idea of the neighborhood out reach is a needed thing and it is something that we as a commission have
And so, it is lovely they want to raise money, i love sfjazz to death. But if they want to be up on saturday night amplifying in a tent which is not sound proof to 11 30 at night in the street, i think that it behoofs them to be here. I make a motion that we move this to may 6th. I second. All right. The motion to continue in to the next meeting, may 6th. Yes. Do we need to take the Public Comment first . Continuing this. All right. Okay, on the motion to continue this to may 6th. The same house same call . Yes. Yes. Continued to may 6th. And then the final loud speaker permit is on your. Are you ready for that one . We seconded it. Oh, we did. So the final permit is for additionally a Cultural Institution and the sf is doing a gala or a modern ball, i think that it is called. And that goes in the other one. And they have and it is in your packet, withdrawn this application and so i think that there is no conversation and there will not be amplification on it, outside in the morning on
That it is i understand that if good for one it should be good for all, but also think that this commission in its early days had a discussion about not putting undo stress on applicants for permits and that is why we grant conditionally and we dont make them come back after all of their signoff and stuff like that. And so, although, i see your point, and in most cases i would agree with you in this particular case, i do not. On my time during the commission, i know that we have added a condition that says that we approve, and allowed our staff to make that judgment whether they felt like the neighborhood out reach has been sufficient. So we can approve it with that amend that motion, though, and so i dont know if that is something that you feel like could work. One of the things that i am going to say about that is that it is okay to generally approve that, but as we get more into the idea of the neighborhood out reach is a needed thing and it is something that we as a commission have
That have been working on this. Were trying to be fair and get their input and then we will know how to proceed. But the bottom line is this this week we are going to pass a Flood Insurance relief bill off the floor of the United States senate, and i want to put everybody here on notice that we have run out of patience. We have been working on this for a year and a half. We were told before christmas we could have a vote. Then we were told we could have a vote when we got back. Then we were told we could have a vote before we left. This is it. Theres no more time. Were voting on this this week. Were either going to do it the easy way or the hard way. Were either going to have a few amendments that the republicans put up, democrats put up, and we get back to legislating like we should, or the leader is going to file cloture on this bill and were going to pass it without an amendment. And if one single republican comes to this floor and sthaeus they did not and says that they did not hav
Market from operating in full lets say you really are preventing other areas for rent they cant id ask that you mrs. Consider the jobs. Theres never any jobs about the attorneys and the plumper and other professionals. Id ask we pleas move forward with this study and move forward with a halt the current legislation thank you. Good afternoon, commissioners im pat im the of the triangle neighborhood association. D t n a is very supportive of this report that was generated probably the most comprehensive report weve seen. Traditionally e typically this report was not pleasure able to read but not this one. The study sites really the converge of the multiple legislative propdz by supervisors, the proposals by neighborhood, d t and a being one the neighborhoods we had a demonstrated need of the policy in our neighborhood which this Commission Adopted and that policy came in being about in a year to a year and a half with some Due Diligence in working with the Planning Department to come up