Which one, in the 11to15y r 11to15year yeah, the m. C. U. Is one of the buses. Commissioner covington okay. But above that m. C. U. , two steps, you have mass cas. Thats one of the two that im talking about, mass casualty here. Commissioner covington okay. I have some concern about that because just about every day on the news, theres a mass casualty someplace in the united states. Its really quite distressing so what is the plan to update these units . One thing i would say is these units, theyre not used all the time. Theyre still in good shape. Commissioner covington im sorry . Theyre what . Still in good shape . Yeah, theyre still in good shape. Trucks for Certain Companies are our highest demand. We have to always put priority for the engine trucks so we have use for every day and as the budget functions and the money allows from city hall, we see items here on the list that we can update, so were working with the chief here and mark corso, we have some updates that we can identif
Ethics penalty that forms the basis of that debt . I would say no. So the language in the agreement does not preclude them from being able to challenge it. Question ten, can the Ethics Commission take it back after they make a referral to negotiate or does a referral indicate we own the account . We do not own it. Its fine for the Ethics Commission to recall an account back if they needed to renegotiate for whatever the reasons might be. Some of the common things we see with clients is if they send an obligation to us and say we were off on the amount that was due or there was the due process element that was missed and whenever we administered the penalty to them it wouldnt have that part fixed before we sent it back, that happens on a regular basis with other clients, and we treat those cases the same. Its fine to have them pulled back. The only thing is if the client or the debtor is responding after efforts have been initiated, whenever they make payments, the commissions are still
No Public Comment. Agenda item number 8, discussion of informational report regarding possible elements in revising the commissions fixed penalty policy. Good afternoon, chair chiu and commissioners. My name is eric willett. Im an aid, senior investigator analyst with enforcement division. Im here to provide an update on staffs efforts to revise the penalty policy into the streamlined administrative Resolution Program. At the august 2019 Commission Meeting, directors commissioners directed staff to move forward with the policy to reduce incertainty and time spent negotiating a settlement by providing a level of standardization and predictability to the commissions Enforcement Program. At the september 2019 meeting, staff delivered a process outline with eight steps and appear today to deliver step four by detailing the progress staff made on steps one through three. Commission staff reviewed the practices of other jurisdictions including the fair political practices commission, l. A. C
Not on a short statute of limitations, as you just said, it can sit fairly dormant and every once in a while somebody picks it up and runs it through the system to see if that person has made their presence known or an asset made available. Right. So its not like somebody is spending 15 minutes every week trying to find this person for seven years, right . No, no, no. It will be typically we look for judgment cases, specific for small volumes, well have like nine active account. Once a month theyll touch it. And it depends if they are able to identify any leads to an asset. But the judgments we are good for ten years, and we renew them up to the full 30 years. So actually on that note for Chris Jackson whose referral date was six and a half years ago, i did spend not 15 minutes but ten minutes to make sure that thats actually on the agenda, though, his specific case. Can we anybody feel comfortable i would refrain from referring to specific cases. Somebody might want to talk with him a
Of the rule book being changed four times in the past fiveyears its time to change it again. We need to reprioritize mature trees to sequester as much carbon as possible. Replacement trees have to be evergreen. When the trees have already dropped their leaves. These replacements absolutely have to be evergreen. The city of San Francisco needs to realize its tree protocol subject to Climate Change and take action or we wont be in a position to recover. Maam, thank you. Next. Welcome. Hi. My name is brook armstrong. I had a business in hayes valley for ten years. Ive been in San Francisco for almost 40. I have an issue of trust with the dpw. My business is on franklin street. And they just took down two large beautiful trees last week without notice. Its frustrating because two years ago they took down another tree in front of my building without notice and it remains a hole in the ground. So for two years they have not replaced that tree. So i feel dubious about what they are saying. It