The department. What are the departments doing in terms of consumption and conservation and who is doing well and not. No. 4, how are we protecting the water system, maintaining and updating and improving the water structure and guarding for fire and funding for immediate projects. No. 5, longterm planning. How are we planning for population growth. What are we doing to find sources water whether it be desaulization and i know puc grant was putting a proposal on hold and i would like to hear more about that. What are the departments doing to educate water customers, no. 6, to educate customers about the needs to previous and the methods to preserve. Those are my objections today. Thank you all for being here and with that, i want to turn it over to richie, assistant general manager for water. Thank you, madam chair and supervise ofrments supervisors. The last time we called for reduction it rained. When people start paying attention, we get somewhere. I would like to start off with thi
The city state Revenue Reserve lost fund. So, our recommendation are on the bottom of page 36. We recommend that you amend the ordinance to delete the Human Service agencies, appropriation for inhouse supported Services Administration and reduce a million 114,76 total requested appropriation by 581,300. That would reflect revised total of 5 34,0 06 remaining for the department of Public Health. And we recommend that you amendedth proposed ordinance on page 2 to reduce ,169,175 offsetting appropriation from state loss Revenue Reserve by the same 580,300 to 6,589,585. And our second recommendation is to amend the ordinance on page 2 to delete the 1,800,000 source of funding for the children with families commission. And on page 5 to delete that same 1,800,000 appropriation no longer needed by the commission. They have sufficient funds in their budget. So, its not under budgeting that. It would be fully it would be fully budgeted. Its simply that in this request its no longer needed. And
Idea to lets bring them back early and work with senator hancock to work with that to give the county the pilot to do this. I support everything the sheriff said to this being a really Innovative Program and the opportunity to work with the population and got the governors attention that hes written this into pod of over crowding and one of the strategies that hes basically implementing is to take it instead of the 60 days is to take it to 365 days. So the only ask is that i would have if the board could approve with one slight alteration this language that 56 bed is what guides the dollar amount in the contract, the 4. Whatever million thats being looked at. The state is looking forward to improving that to 365 days im going to come back because im going to be a hard negotiator and this is what i told the Governors Office and the Prison Law Office that 77,000 a day on an on going basis is not enough for all the wrap around services they want. What i would ask is if we could instead of
I dont know if that will be disclog be too much. I certainly would think that the Controllers Office would want to explain why it is. Or should not be disclosed. Any other thoughts from the commissioners on this . In a theoretical file, not the one at issue, are matters such as the timing of meetings, or strictly procedural matters included in the correspondence files of an investigate oral matter. Generally strictly procedural, and for example, when you talk about a meeting time, that is embedded within the procedure process, for instance if i am going to meet with a complaintant and you document your notes, i met with this complaintant at this time and here is what we discussed. So you would see it in that, i think, clearly would be confidential. What i am asking about is if you send an email to a Ethics Commission saying can we talk at 2 00 is that in the file . No, you are not going to see can we talk at 2 00 you will see the result of that conversation. We met at. And we discussed
Protected confidential. I am trying to understand what kind of information could be in the file that if we asked the Controllers Office and the Ethics Commission to rereview for potentially nonprivileged documents what those could even entail. Because the breadth of this privilege appears so broad that it is hard to imagine what would not be covered in light of yours and the City Attorneys of San Franciscos description. Sure. And maybe, internal communications about we are going to meet to discuss this at such and such a time. I dont know if who is assigned to the investigation, if that necessarily would be confidential, or how many people are assigned. I dont know if that will be disclog be too much. I certainly would think that the Controllers Office would want to explain why it is. Or should not be disclosed. Any other thoughts from the commissioners on this . In a theoretical file, not the one at issue, are matters such as the timing of meetings, or strictly procedural matters incl