Any idea of how much time do you need . Up to ten but if you can do it in five. In five, absolutely. Jodie knight, here on behalf of the project team. Thanks for your time today. Thanks very much to staff for their hard work on the presentation. Justhis is the proposed project which you saw a small picture of. Wear excited about this project. Its been a long time in the making with a lot of discussions over the course of the years its been underway with staff and have victi come to the currt design of the existing facade and harmonizing that with a proposed addition through the proposed materials. If we want to do it in five, we should jump into stacies presentation. Thank you again for your time. We dont need to rush through it but i wanted a sense you dont need to hear from me any more. Thank you. Im with paige and turn turn. Its a noproject alternative including no modifications to the Historic Resource, no hotel unit added. All of the defining features would be retaunted wit retain
And do some vital programming for the programs and families that are going to be moving into the area. We support this project and the market octavia amendment. Thank you. Next speaker, please. I am a hays valley resident and a longterm supporter of market and octavia. When this was coming up and talking about 400foot towers, they would say you support this . Yes, i do. This is the transit hub. So to much criticism from some people, i was an aggressive supporter of all of this. I think some of what concerns me about this in addition to some technical points and the points raised by the other speakers about the adequacy of muni and other things like that for services, when the proposal to raise some of the 400foot towers was first voiced, it was look at the esthetic of this tower with 400foot towers. We can do thinner, elegant, beautiful, very tight and its going to really look gorgeous. Well get some extra housing out of it. Isnt that good . Yeah, that sounds good. However, as its deve
Rather than a static sculpture and do some vital programming for the programs and families that are going to be moving into the area. We support this project and the market octavia amendment. Thank you. Next speaker, please. I am a hays valley resident and a longterm supporter of market and octavia. When this was coming up and talking about 400foot towers, they would say you support this . Yes, i do. This is the transit hub. So to much criticism from some people, i was an aggressive supporter of all of this. I think some of what concerns me about this in addition to some technical points and the points raised by the other speakers about the adequacy of muni and other things like that for services, when the proposal to raise some of the 400foot towers was first voiced, it was look at the esthetic of this tower with 400foot towers. We can do thinner, elegant, beautiful, very tight and its going to really look gorgeous. Well get some extra housing out of it. Isnt that good . Yeah, that so
Opportunity to expand. How do we accomplish that . How do i take care of my family . How do i invest in this city, when i cant even invest in my own home. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hi, im jennifer fever with the San Francisco tenants union. So the easiest way to protect tenants and affordable rents to keep them housed in the first place. Its been a very frustrating few years for us. Weve had a bunch of tenants come to us worried about losing their homes during extensive renovations. So we started experimenting with filing d. R. S and weve learned a lot about the Planning Department and their process. Most surprising to me the planning staff had no directive to consider how permits affect existing tenants. The planning code is written so narrowly, they can claim to have hamstrung rather than considering humans in their plans. Tenants are 65 of the population. We should matter. I challenge the architects in this room to hold the public forum about their role in our disp
For the past three years, i have not had a Single Family house. Every project i do has, if its an rh2 district, two units and rh3 we try to get three units in there. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Thank you. Thank you. Hello. My name is luke. I have been the principal of an Architecture Studio in San Francisco for the past 20 years. Im also a member of the a. A. I. A. Public and policy committee. I find most of the specifics to be overly restrictive with a clear bias towards the radical historicallism. For instance, the grab bag to qualify for conditional use demolition is clearly designed to be unachievable, particularly egregious is the subject building not resemble the height scale and architecture of surrounding buildings. This language is so deliberately vague, and subject to personal interpretation, that it could easily disqualify nearly all potential candidates for demolition consideration. Doesnt every existing Single Family house in San Francisco recommend assembl