Has he really seen the light or is this another cunning plan to continue begging billions from his owners washington can fulfill zelenskys longstanding dream Ballistic Missiles atak ms will allegedly be included in the next package of military assistance to ukraine that this is a gesture of support or desperation for the motherland they didnt want to fight in a foreign land they had to take a military position that rushed to israel and now complain that they are being drafted into the local army. So why fought . Firstly, the ukrainians effectively cursed the romanians, who are stopping the Russian Militarys attacks on the port infrastructure. The odessa region now even has a point on the map for a better overview. An extraordinary decision from the point of view of common sense, this is exactly how the kremlin today commented on the European Unions ban on the import of personal belongings of russians, as stated by the press secretary of the russian president dmitry peskov. Moscow will
Commission. President diamond here. Commission Vice President moore here. Commissioner braun here. Commissioner imperiale here. Commissioner koppell here. And commissioner williams here. Commissioners, first on your agenda is consideration of items proposed for continuance. Items one, a and b for case numbers 2022. Hyphen 00979 for drp and var for the property at 1153 guerrero street. Discretionary review and variance are proposed for continuance to may 2nd, 2024. Item two, case number 2023 hyphen 007496 drp at 638 rhode island street. A discretionary review is proposed for continuance to may 9th, 2024, and item three, case number 2022. Hyphen 006831dm at 619 marina boulevard, a staff initiated discretionary review has been withdrawn. I have no other items proposed to be continued, so we should take Public Comment only on the matter of continuance, members of the public, this is your opportunity to, speak to any of these continuances. Please come forward. Seeing no request to speak Pub
Commission. President diamond here. Commission Vice President moore here. Commissioner braun here. Commissioner imperiale here. Commissioner koppell here. And commissioner williams here. Commissioners, first on your agenda is consideration of items proposed for continuance. Items one, a and b for case numbers 2022. Hyphen 00979 for drp and var for the property at 1153 guerrero street. Discretionary review and variance are proposed for continuance to may 2nd, 2024. Item two, case number 2023 hyphen 007496 drp at 638 rhode island street. A discretionary review is proposed for continuance to may 9th, 2024, and item three, case number 2022. Hyphen 006831dm at 619 marina boulevard, a staff initiated discretionary review has been withdrawn. I have no other items proposed to be continued, so we should take Public Comment only on the matter of continuance, members of the public, this is your opportunity to, speak to any of these continuances. Please come forward. Seeing no request to speak Pub
Case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado civil rights commission. The case arose when Charlie Craig and david mullins, a gay cupple who walked tomorrow when Masterpiece Cakeshop in lakewood, colorado, owned and operated by Jack Phillips, a devout christian. As with all of his customers, phillip said no problem with selling the couple anything off the shelf, but he declined to make a custom made cake to celebrate the couples wedding. Citing his religious convictions. He was willing to direct them to nearby bakeries and would design a cake as he had done with others. Unsatisfied, craig and mullins filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission alleged that phillips had violated the colorado antidiscrimination act. Finding in their favor, the commission ordered phillips, among other things torques conduct comprehensive staff things, to conduct comprehensive staff training including his family members who worked at the bakery. After supporters of craig and mullins picketed the
Masterpiece cake shop in colorado refused to make a wedding cake for samesex couples on religious grounds. The court will hear the case tomorrow. The Cato Institute hosted this debate. Good afternoon. Welcome to the Cato Institute. I am the Vice President for legal affairs, founding director of the center for constitutional studies and your host for this afternoons debate. I want to welcome those that are joining us on cspan and through the lifestream. We are here to consider whether religious liberty can coexist with antidiscrimination law. We will hear oral arguments tomorrow when it hears the case of the Masterpiece Cake shop the colorado Civil Rights Commission. The case arose when Charlie Cragg couple walked into the cake shop in colorado owned and operated by Jack Phillips a devout christian as with all of his customers and phillips had no problem selling anything off the shelf but he declined to make a custommade cake to celebrate the couples wedding citing his religious convict