And staff will be participating in todays meeting remotely. This precaution is taken pursuant to the local, state and federal orders, declarations and directives. Commission members will attend the meeting through Video Conference and participate in the meeting to the same extent as if they were physically present. Please note that todays meeting is live cable cast on sfgovtv and streamed live online at sfgovtv. Org, ethicslive. Once again, streamed live online at sfgovtv. Org ethicslive. Public comment will be available on each of the items on this agenda. Each member of the public will be allowed three minutes to speak. Comments are opportunities to speak during the Public Comment period and are available by calling 1 415 6550001. Again, the phone number is 1 415 6550001. Access code is 1465252262. Again, access code is 14652522 1465252262. Followed by the pound sign. And then press pound again to join as an attendee. You will hear a beep when you are connected to the meeting. You wi
Probably would take issues with them and articulate that in the coming days. Host one of those issues is that it doesnt preempt states from doing their own thing. Guest as i read the piece, its not a proactive preemption structure. Still allows the commission to go forward and challenge states where the item would be in conflict with our rules. So i think its going to lead to more state by state challenges, a case by case challenge, if you will, than the overall arching one that i was hoping for. I think what youre going to see is a number of states is have done things that i disagree with, and having 50 different states pull us in Different Directions is not what, you know, the structure should be. Its not interstate commerce. Its why we have an interstate Commerce Clause are, in by opinion, and its not something they have expertise in, because theyre supposed to be governing intrastate traffic. And there is no intrastate traffic on the internet. Host joining us to drill down into thi
They seem to have found the right landing spot on a couple of decisions. There are a couple of pieces i would take issue with that will articulate that in coming days. Iser one issue reported that it doesnt preempt states from doing their own thing. Commissioner orielly as i read the piece, it is not a proactive preemption structure. It still allows challenges to states where the item would be in conflict with our rules. It will lead to more statebystate challenges, casebycase challenges, than the overall, overarching one i was hoping for. Because what you are going to see is, a number of states have already acted in doing certain things i disagree with, you will see others jump in, and having 50 different states pull us in different directions, some with Net Neutrality one way, some with Net Neutrality another way, is not what the structure should be. Not interstate commerce. Its why we have an interstate commerce clause, and it is not something they have expertise in. Structure,nitio
House, the supreme court, and Public Policy events from washington, d. C. And around the country, so you can make up your own mind. Crated by cable in 1979, cspan is brought to you by your local or cable satellite provider. Cspan, your unfiltered view of government. Peter and Michael Orielly is one of five commissioners on the federal communications commission, and he is our guest tonight on the communicators. Welcome. I want to get your Immediate Reaction to the Net Neutrality case. Commissioner orielly im still digesting the decision from the court read it is quite lengthy. From the court. It is quite lengthy. But im generally pleased. They seem to have found the right landing spot on a couple of decisions. There are a couple of pieces i would take issue with that will articulate that in coming days. Peter well, one of those issues that has been reported already is that it doesnt preempt states from doing their own thing. Commissioner orielly as i read the piece, its not a proactive
Your local cable or satellite provider. Speech than, your unfiltered view of government. Host Michael Orielly is one of five commissioners on the federal Communications Commission and he is our guest this week on the communicators. Welcome back. Commissioner orielly, its only been about an hour since the court decided the Net Neutrality case. Want to get your immediate reaction. Guest in fairness unstressed digesting the item, the decision from the court. Its quite lengthy. Im generally pleased. They seem to have found the right landing spot in a number of decisions. Our couple pieces i probably would take issue with them and probably articulate that in the coming days. Host one of the issues thats been reported is that it doesnt preempt states from doing their own thing. Guest as i read it its not a proactive preemption structure. It still allows the commission to go forward and child in states with the item would be in conflict with our rules. Its going to lead to more statebystate c