ackley said he loved his common-law mother-in-law and was devastated by her murder. but family members said that was a lie. well, he didn t like her. and it was no secret she didn t like him. but no one in the family did like him. their relationship can best be described as being acrimonious. arlene jensen was concerned about the welfare of her daughter whom she believed was at least verbally and psychologically being abused by gary ackley. arlene also didn t like the way ackley treated her grandchildren. when she would express those concerns, particularly in the presence of gary ackley, it became quite apparent that he didn t want her anywhere around. and ackley s fights with arlene were well-known to neighbors and family members. they got into a disagreement during which gary ackley called her at a minimum a bitch and depending on whose version you believe a [ bleep ].
killed her mother. so after his conviction, she cemented their common-law relationship by formally marrying him in a prison ceremony. i don t know. i ve tried to understand that before and all i can make of it is domestic violence in its severest form. the brainwashing, the abuse that just makes that person just not even think for themselves because it s so plain to see. you know. two murders, seemingly unrelated, but unmistakably connected by a series of microscopic clues. detectives all over this country are solving murder cases that are 20 or 30 or 40 years old based on science that didn t exist seven or eight years ago. so my expectation is that gary ackley, one, was not a very intelligent fellow and two, there was not this blitz of information from the media about
underneath that, they were blood stains and i tested that and they were indeed positive for blood. the comforter didn t have any blood but the sheets underneath did. this meant someone pulled the comforter over the sheet after the blood was dry, which would have been about 30 minutes later. on the bathroom floor were some used towels and two cigarette butts were in the toilet with the seat and lid left up. all these clues told a story. some man had been in her home, some man had used the toilet and flipped his cigarette butts into the toilet and failed to flush before he left. someone has been there for a while, long enough to smoke at least one cigarette, possibly even two. they ve had time to have blood dry, been there for at least 30 minutes, and then they have washed their hands or attempted to wash their hands and clean something up. the cigarette butts were the same brand as the empty package found near the victim s body. if arlene had been abducted from her apartment, th
law mother-in-law and was devastated by her murder. but family members said that was a lie. well, he didn t like her. and it was no secret she didn t like him. but no one in the family did like him. their relationship can best be described as being acrimonious. arlene jensen was concerned about the welfare of her daughter whom she believed was at least verbally and psychologically being abused by gary ackley. arlene also didn t like the way ackley treated her grandchildren. when she would express those concerns, particularly in the presence of gary ackley, it became quite apparent that he didn t want her anywhere around. and ackley s fights with arlene were well-known to neighbors and family members. they got into a disagreement during which gary ackley called her at a minimum a bitch and depending on whose version you
refused to believe that ackley killed her mother. so after his conviction, she cemented their common-law relationship by formally marrying him in a prison ceremony. i don t know. i ve tried to understand that before and all i can make of it is domestic violence in its severest form. the brainwashing, the abuse that just makes that person just not even think for themselves because it s so plain to see. you know. two murders, seemingly unrelated, but unmistakably connected by a series of microscopic clues. detectives all over this country are solving murder cases that are 20 or 30 or 40 years old based on science that didn t exist seven or eight years ago. so my expectation is that gary ackley, one, was not a very intelligent fellow and two, there was not this blitz of information from the media about